Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2019-05-14 11:16:42
Size: 1119
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2019-05-14 11:41:38
Size: 865
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
  * ETMY has high power coil driver now.

 * IOO:
Line 17: Line 20:
 * Y arm was locked with IR by frequency feedback.
 * The frequency fluctuation of IR was too much for the mass lock, so IR frequency should be stabilized by X arm.
 * X arm and Y arm were aligned and resonate at at time. Beam position at ITMY was too high(1-2cm), and beam position at ITMX was too low(~1cm).
=== Discussion ===
 *
Line 21: Line 23:
=== Discussion ===
Line 29: Line 30:
 * Next meeting: 5/14.  * Next meeting: 5/21.

Minute of KAGRA commissioning meeting


  • Date: 2019/5/14 11:00AM~11:40AM
  • Attendance: Miyakawa, Yamamoto, Stefan, Nakano, Tomura, Miyo, Stefan, Aso, Kokeyama, Oshino, Inoue
  • Zoom: Ushiba, Sawada, Takahashi, Uchiyama


Summary of this week

  • Height adsustment: Target is ITMY 6mm upper, ITMX 5mm lower.
    • One of the stepping motor did not work. It seems current problem. It will be checked today.
    • ITMY adjustment was done. ITMX height changed ~2mm.
  • ETMY will be used for mass feed back.
    • ETMY has high power coil driver now.
  • IOO:

Discussion

  • What is the configuration for FPMI?
    • Locked Fabry-Perot?
  • Engineering run should not fix the configuration to FPMI. Configuration should be flexible. We assume June run as proposed.


Others

  • Next meeting: 5/21.

KAGRA/Commissioning/Weekly/20190514/Minute (last edited 2019-05-14 12:45:10 by OsamuMiyakawa)