= Simulation Summary (so-far) Meeting = 2020 Nov 11, 3pm - 5pm, zoom2 == Guest == Hiro Yamamoto Sensei == Participants == Kokeyama, Hirose, Wang, YamamotoH, Leonaridi, Koyama, Oshino, Akutus, Michimura, Yuzurihara, Somiya, Miyakawa, Oshino == Agenda == || Topic || Speaker || Slide Link || Dur || || Finesse IFO model || Kokeyama || [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12225|o]]|| 5 mins || || OMC model || Park || || 5 mins || || Finesse GUI || Koyama, Hirose || [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12227|GUI]][[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12226|cross check]]|| 10 mins || || Birefringence || Wang || [[ https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12222|link]] || 10 mins || * We will have free discussion time after each talk, which is not shown in the table == Minues == === OMC === * Wedge angles of OMC1, OMC2 matters? * Should we include the thickness (and wedge) of OMC1? (Somiya-san) Gouy phase difference between V and H is <1 deg, which should be negligible. * (Hiro-san)The slope (from HOM 0 -8 of the experiment) maybe reflecting the spatial abbreviation of the test masses having longer wavelength more than short wavelength * (Akutsu-san) Aso-san’s document: [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10527|this]]. The current OMC is base on the **-R500.*** files. It is nice to confirm it with him! In my memo, with this document, I did double-checking of the Aso-san’s ray-trace with another commercial simulator. === GUI === * The windows installation procedure is ready * (Hiro-san) Can you add mirrors? - No * We can expand the configuration, such as OMC and IMC. * (Akutsu-san) Can you change macroscopic lengths? - Yes === Birefringence === * Mach-Zhender model to simulate S->S, S->P, P->S, P->P conversion. * The intuitive understanding of this model is to convert S-P basis to e-o basis (extraordinary and ordinary axes) by the first BS, and covert back to S-P by the second BS. * Are the phi maps really correct * We need alpha_{-} map for the simulation * We look for measurement data with circular polarization (P.6 of Haoyou's slide) * Is phi and alpha_{-} related? * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/DocDB/0110/G1911070/002/Polarization%20and%20Absorption%20Maps_f2f201912.pdf|This]] measurement shows only a few degree birefringence (sample sapphire, NAOJ measurement) whereas our phi map is -40~40 degrees. * [[https://journals.aps.org/prapplied/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014021|Hirose-san paper]] (showing the measurement method) * Maybe we can have a small meeting with Matteo nad Aso-san for their help?