Differences between revisions 20 and 21
Revision 20 as of 2020-03-09 05:59:37
Size: 3182
Comment:
Revision 21 as of 2020-03-09 06:08:05
Size: 4057
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 63: Line 63:
 * Hammering test around BS
  * Possible noise source
 * Hammering test around BS chamber
  * Possible noise source 70-100Hz
  * Identification the noise path
   * From leg? From oplev? From duct?
  * Set accelerometer for feed-forward

 * Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
  * We didn't get any information from those chambers

 * Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
  * This chamber is including the ISS system
  * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
  * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
  * Identification of the noise path

 * Hammering test of the MCF chamber
  * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
  * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
  * Identification of the noise path

 * Hammering test of the cryochamber
  * [[http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Minute|Discussion]]

Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)

- Hammering test

Task list (Done)

  • Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
    • There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
    • Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
    • Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
  • Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
    • In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
    • After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.

Task list (Partially done)

  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Hammering test around BS chamber
    • Possible noise source 70-100Hz
    • Identification the noise path
      • From leg? From oplev? From duct?
    • Set accelerometer for feed-forward
  • Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
    • We didn't get any information from those chambers
  • Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
    • This chamber is including the ISS system
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the MCF chamber
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the cryochamber

Task list (todo ; if possible)

- PEM injection

Task list (Done)

  • Vibration injection to OMC leg for optical table
    • klog13152

    • We confirmed that the vibration from OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve

Task list (todo ; must items)

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020 (last edited 2020-03-21 04:36:19 by TakaakiYokozawa)