Differences between revisions 36 and 37
Revision 36 as of 2020-03-12 03:49:49
Size: 6466
Comment:
Revision 37 as of 2020-03-12 03:54:49
Size: 6647
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 140: Line 140:
 * Acoustic injection to the POP table (11th Mar.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13458|klog13458]]
  * Large excess 320-400Hz (Related ISS? new noise candidate?)

Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)

  • Summary result of the acoustic injection here

Priority of task

  • Hammering test around REFL table
    • Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
    • Noise projection from chamber legs to DARM by vibrator
    • Move the accelerometers as you like
  • Hammering test around POP table
    • Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
    • Prefer the PR2-BS duct hammering
  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
    • If Tomaru-san or Ushiba-san help
  • Set the accelerometer and vibrator to OMC chamber
    • With Miyoki-san

- Hammering test

Task list (Done)

  • Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
    • There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
    • Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
    • Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
  • Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
    • In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
    • After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.

Task list (Partially done)

  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Hammering test around BS chamber
    • Possible noise source 70-100Hz
    • Identification the noise path
      • From leg? From oplev? From duct?
    • Set accelerometer for feed-forward
  • Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
    • We don't have any information from those chambers yet.
  • Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
    • This chamber is including the ISS system
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the MCF chamber
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
  • Hammering test of the ducts
    • To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
    • We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test
  • Hammering test of the optical tables
    • (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table
    • (Should) POS table, TMSX table, TMSY table
    • (If possible) OpLev tables, PCal tables

  • Hammering test of the MCF-PSL tube

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Hammering test of the IXA and IYA chamber
    • Non black coating materials
  • Hammering test of the end station
    • EXC, EYC, EXA, EYA chambers
    • TMSX, TMSY chamber

- PEM injection

Task list (Done)

  • Vibration injection to OMC legs
    • klog13152

    • We confirmed that the vibration of the OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve
  • Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
    • We couldn't find the any excess
  • Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)
  • Acoustic injection to the POP table (11th Mar.)
    • klog13458

    • Large excess 320-400Hz (Related ISS? new noise candidate?)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
    • After hammering test, we will investigate the environmental vibration may appear to the sensitivity or not
  • Acoustic injection to the POP table

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Acoustic injection to the cryochamber
  • Magnetic injection

- Other task by PEM(?)

Task list (done)

Task list (todo)

  • Check and remove the unused cables
  • Clean up on the optical table
  • Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument
  • Turn off the some lights
  • Clean up the experimental area
    • Clean environment may make the clean experiment

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020 (last edited 2020-03-21 04:36:19 by TakaakiYokozawa)