Differences between revisions 38 and 39
Revision 38 as of 2020-03-12 03:55:04
Size: 6601
Comment:
Revision 39 as of 2020-03-18 06:03:01
Size: 6619
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
 * Hammering test around REFL table
  * Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
  * Noise projection from chamber legs to DARM by vibrator
  * Move the accelerometers as you like

 * Hammering test around POP table
  * Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
  * Prefer the PR2-BS duct hammering
Line 18: Line 9:

 * Set the accelerometer and vibrator to OMC chamber
  * With Miyoki-san
Line 47: Line 35:


=== Task list (Partially done) ===
Line 78: Line 63:


=== Task list (todo ; must items) ===
Line 83: Line 64:
  * Possible noise source 70-100Hz
  * Identification the noise path
   * From leg? From oplev? From duct?
  * When hammering the bellows between PR2 and BS, 70-100Hz was excited. Scattered noise?
   * It seems from duct
Line 87: Line 67:
   * But, we couldn't see in the spectrum of the portable ACC.
Line 89: Line 70:
  * We don't have any information from those chambers yet.   * Finally, we found that vibration around the IMC gate valve is the path to DARM displacement.
  * Most suspect noise path is scattered light from AR MCO reflected around gate valve and back to main laser.
  * Reducing the vibration.
Line 95: Line 78:
  * Identification of the noise path   * No significant result was obtained
Line 100: Line 83:
  * Identification of the noise path   * We had several noise increasing, Washimi-san investigate now.
  * We also do hammering test to the PSL window

 * Hammering test of the optical tables
  * (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table, ISS table
  * (Should) POS table
  * (If possible) OpLev tables (PR area)
  * We can find 500Hz noise may come from the REFL table

=== Task list (todo ; must items) ===
Line 110: Line 102:
  * (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table
* (Should) POS table, TMSX table, TMSY table
  * (If possible) OpLev tables, PCal tables

 * Hammering test of the MCF-PSL tube
  * (Should) TMSX table, TMSY table
  * (If possible) PCal tables
Line 144: Line 133:
 * Acoustic injection to the cryochamber
  * Done to IXC. Effect would be small.
Line 147: Line 139:
  * After hammering test, we will investigate the environmental vibration may appear to the sensitivity or not   * We did for MCF and IMM legs, but we can ignore the vibration
  * We set the oscillator and accelerometer to OMC leg again
Line 150: Line 143:

 * Acoustic injection to the cryochamber

Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)

  • Summary result of the acoustic injection here

Priority of task

  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
    • If Tomaru-san or Ushiba-san help

- Hammering test

Task list (Done)

  • Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
    • There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
    • Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
    • Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
  • Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
    • In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
    • After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.
  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  • Hammering test around BS chamber
    • When hammering the bellows between PR2 and BS, 70-100Hz was excited. Scattered noise?
      • It seems from duct
    • Set accelerometer for feed-forward
      • But, we couldn't see in the spectrum of the portable ACC.
  • Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
    • Finally, we found that vibration around the IMC gate valve is the path to DARM displacement.
    • Most suspect noise path is scattered light from AR MCO reflected around gate valve and back to main laser.
    • Reducing the vibration.
  • Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
    • This chamber is including the ISS system
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • No significant result was obtained
  • Hammering test of the MCF chamber
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • We had several noise increasing, Washimi-san investigate now.
    • We also do hammering test to the PSL window
  • Hammering test of the optical tables
    • (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table, ISS table
    • (Should) POS table
    • (If possible) OpLev tables (PR area)

    • We can find 500Hz noise may come from the REFL table

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
  • Hammering test of the ducts
    • To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
    • We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test
  • Hammering test of the optical tables
    • (Should) TMSX table, TMSY table
    • (If possible) PCal tables

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Hammering test of the IXA and IYA chamber
    • Non black coating materials
  • Hammering test of the end station
    • EXC, EYC, EXA, EYA chambers
    • TMSX, TMSY chamber

- PEM injection

Task list (Done)

  • Vibration injection to OMC legs
    • klog13152

    • We confirmed that the vibration of the OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve
  • Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
    • We couldn't find the any excess
  • Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)
  • Acoustic injection to the POP table (11th Mar.)
    • klog13458

    • Large excess 320-400Hz (Related ISS? new noise candidate?)
  • Acoustic injection to the cryochamber
    • Done to IXC. Effect would be small.

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
    • We did for MCF and IMM legs, but we can ignore the vibration
    • We set the oscillator and accelerometer to OMC leg again

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Magnetic injection

- Other task by PEM(?)

Task list (done)

Task list (todo)

  • Check and remove the unused cables
  • Clean up on the optical table
  • Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument
  • Turn off the some lights
  • Clean up the experimental area
    • Clean environment may make the clean experiment

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020 (last edited 2020-03-21 04:36:19 by TakaakiYokozawa)