Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2021-06-18 13:47:58
Size: 5791
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2021-06-18 13:48:37
Size: 5790
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 87: Line 87:
 * I wonder how to proceed: during installation we were not able to distribute the masses evenly around the circumference becuase the magic wand (yet to be conforimed with a kalog entry).  * I wonder how to proceed: during installation we were not able to distribute the masses evenly around the circumference becuase the magic wand (yet to be conforimed with a klog entry).

Agenda/Minutes

Zoom Meeting


CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

Date: 2021/6/18 13:00-

Participants:

Post O3 Upgrade portal

Schedule

  • IX: H4 geophone was replaced. Top chamber was closed again.
  • IY: Schedule: Rough alignment of TM?
  • EX: Adjustment of Yaw FR and IP tuning was finished. Broken cable was recovered. Top chamber was closed.
  • EY: Assembly of payload is on going. Status of mirror cleaning?

Status

  • Corrugate tube fixing jig: Delivery and implement were scheduled on 7/12-13.
  • TM height setting: Next target is ITMY.
  • Commissioning in air: X-arm.
  • Commissioning in vacuum:
  • Overall commissioning:
  • Acceptance check: Group work is set every Friday.
  • PF actuator: After SC.
  • Jig for FC painting:
  • Separation of rack in 2F: On the maintenance days.
  • Disassembly of PRM/PR2 assembly frame: This was scheduled on 6/28-29.

Discussion


VIS Meeting

14:00-

Participants:

Klog

This is generated by python script in /users/Miyo/dropbox/Script/scrapping/main.py.

Summary Report

Type-A

  • Tuned the F0 in IY.
  • Adjusted the yaw FR in EX. Tuned the IP. The H4 geophone was put on the IP. Repaired some in-vacuum cables.
  • Closed the top chambers in IX and EX.

Type-B

Limit switches in SR2 and SR3

There were three switches that didn't seem to be working. Hirata-san fixed them and we checked them with the multimeter. They are working now

SRM

  • We measured IP TF on Monday:
    • The resonant frequencies in L and T looked low enough (63 and 55 mHz) so we didn't adjust the ballast masses.
    • The coherence wasn't bad but not excelent either; the frequency resolution was 10 mHz.
  • Terrence measured TFs again with a better frequency resolution and found that L and T are highly coupled.

[Terrence]

  • Fabian locked the SRM IP so I can measure the LVDT sensor noises.
  • I measured the geophone readouts as well when the IP is unlocked. The suspension is quiet enough so these can be used as sensor noise estimates. [notebook sneak peek]
  • I then measured transfer functions and cross-transfer functions.
    • cross-coupling is confusing. Explain with figure: klog 17137

    • I reverted the sensing matrix and the actuation matrix using Mark's old matrix, which is derived from geometry.
    • Cross-coupling is still confusing between L and T. But at least I can decouple L2Y, T2Y, Y2L and Y2T.
    • I suspect the lowest frequency modes are L-T coupled. I am pretty sure L and T sensors are not 100% coupled as suggested in the figures.
    • I compared the L and T readout with seismic noise in the x-arm and y-arm direction and L has minimal coherence with x-arm while T has minimal coherence with y-arm.
    • Peaks are too close :*(.
  • Some opinion about the RT-model
    • LVDTALIGN and ACCALIGN matrices are great for sensor diagonalization.
    • Why don't add something like COILALIGN (for actuation)?

BS

We revisited the BS IP to check stability and values of resonance frequencies.

  • When we adjusted the ballast mass before the temperature 22.7 degrees, this week was 23.5 degrees; O3GK temperature is 23 degrees.
  • I moved the IP close to the setpoints using the horizontal fishing rods: it looked unstable, it began moving by small amount but it suddendly moved a lot (e.g. from -1.5 mm to 1.5 mm). With some care I was able to move it at the setpoint and measured TFs, the resonant frequencies were 43 and 86 mHz for L and T respectively.

  • We removed 4.5 kg and and the frequencies changed to 93 and 70 mHz for L and T respectively.

  • With the same amount of mass we tested different distributions to check whether we can reduce the assymetry between the resonant frequencies in L and T:
    • See klog.
    • The assymetry remains around 25 mHz: one is typically around 65 mHz and the other one around 90 mHz.

    • Becuase of temperature changes one might be too low and the other too high.
    • L and T seem strongly coupled.
  • I wonder how to proceed: during installation we were not able to distribute the masses evenly around the circumference becuase the magic wand (yet to be conforimed with a klog entry).

Type-Bp

Type-C

Electronics

Control

Schedule

See Schedule

  • Type-A team: ACC preparation
  • Type-B team: Remaining work

Milestone

  • IMC suspensions are ready in air [40] will finish 2021/04/21.

  • PRs are ready in air [643] will finish 2021/07/09.

  • ETMX is ready in air [656] will finish 2021/08/25.

  • ITMX is ready in air [657] will finish 2021/08/31.

  • ETMY is ready in air [658] will finish 2021/09/16.

  • ITMY is ready in air [659] will finish 2021/11/08.

  • BS is ready in air [691] will finish 2021/11/24.

  • SRs are ready in air [663] will finish 2021/12/20.

  • Output suspensions are ready in air [695] will finish 2021/12/21.

  • TMSY is ready in air [708] will finish 2021/??/??.

  • TMSX is ready in air [684] will finish 2021/??/??.

2021/03/29 updated

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

The week from 6/21

  • Takahashi: 6/21-22
  • Hirata: 6/21-22
  • Yano: 6/21-25

The week from 6/28

  • Takahashi: 6/28-7/2
  • Sato: 6/28-7/2
  • Hirata: 6/28-7/2
  • Yano: 6/28-7/2

Next meeting

  • 2021/6/25(FRI)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20210618 (last edited 2021-06-18 14:57:36 by RyutaroTakahashi)