Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2019-08-22 04:39:33
Size: 7497
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2019-08-22 04:51:36
Size: 8459
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 53: Line 53:
   * ET fixed with 1.5 um wavelength which CE2 is aiming at 2 um which have advantage in the scattering
Line 57: Line 57:
   * We should remove the recommendation part from the first release to make it as list of facts
Line 59: Line 60:
   * Ultimate goal of KAGRA    * Ultimate goal of KAGRA (final BOSS)
Line 61: Line 62:

 * We would like to get agreements (understandings) by KAGRA collaborators on
   * By considering the current ITM issue, we should put a minimum success of O5 as BRSE+FDsqz (170 Mpc) with DRSE (150 Mpc) as a backup => this is a Broad-band option
   * Define the ultimate goal of KAGRA towards 2030's (until 3G observation starts) with heavy mass (100~200 kg) and high power (350~500 W) laser to achieve 300~500 Mpc sensitivity. => this is a broad-band option
   * The strategy and path between O5 and ultimate can be discussed according to the technological feasibility and science cases
   * White paper 2nd release to be prepared first as an internal document (Oct.~Dec./2019)
   * Then later, we would like to make it as a publication

Satellite Meeting on Future Upgrade of KAGRA

Main F2F Page

Date/Time/Venue

August 21th (Wed.) 13:00 - 16:10 (We would like to finish the main discussions by 15:30, when the KAGRA site tour starts)

Venue: Multi purpose room (多目的ホール), Faculty of Science, University of Toyama, Gofuku Campus

(Note that different from the venue of F2F meeting, Kuroda hall)

Zoom(2) connection: https://zoom.us/j/6676627462

Anyone are welcome to join the discussions on site or via online and for even those who didn't make a registration.

Program

Time

Subject and Title

Speaker

File

13:00-13:10

Introduction

Introduction from FPC

S. Haino and FPC

(↓)

13:10-14:00

Mirror and Cryogenics

Sapphire Mirror

M.Leonardi,T.Tomaru

o

Heat extraction

T.Yamada,T.Tomaru

o

14:00-16:00

Upgrade plans

Upgrade plans and publication

S. Haino and FPC

o


Minutes (by K.Yamamoto and SH)

  • Sapphire mirror issue (M. Leonardi)
    • iLM(Geppo) is on last stage but his original proposal does not mention birefringence.
    • Now iLM is interested in studying birefringence issue => could be the best solution

    • For near future (O4), 200ppm/cm absorption can be accepted.
    • Internal stress causes birefringence ? Annealing parameter of vendor are not known.
    • ITM for O4 : By re-polishing and same time coating, finesse unbalance could be solved, but birefringence can not be solved (same order of magnitude).
    • Is it worth ? Budget and schedule should be considered. Evaluation by commissioing is necessary (which (finesse unbalance or birefringence) is large must be known).
    • Or fused silica for O4 ? -> coating thermal noise could be an issue. Suspension improvement is necessary. Thermal compensation system is necessary.

    • Silicon test mass ? -> still far future ?

    • IBF (Ion Beam Figuring) can solve only 1 DoF (S-pol) out of 2 (S,P-pol)
  • Heat extraction capacity (T. Yamada)
    • Thermal resistance must be reduced and possible (factor 2) at least for the contact ones.
    • For the sapphire fiber, temperature dependence of thermal conductivity is not taken into account.
    • About 10 K/W out of 35 K/W are from sapphire fiber
    • Heat link is x2 longer than original design
    • 35 K/W may be achieved
  • Upgrade plans and publication (S. Haino)
    • ET fixed with 1.5 um wavelength which CE2 is aiming at 2 um which have advantage in the scattering
    • Publication plan -> First purpose of FPC is PREPARATION of white paper.

    • For the publication, we have to discuss EO (about feasibility, budget, schedule)
    • WP should be prepared for the coming budget proposal, and contribution from FPC is expected ?
    • We should remove the recommendation part from the first release to make it as list of facts
    • Realistic option for O5(perfect 22 kg mirror and FDSQZ) proposed is minimum success.
    • Silicon mirror changes a lot of thing.
    • Ultimate goal of KAGRA (final BOSS)
    • Boundary condition must be defined at first.
  • We would like to get agreements (understandings) by KAGRA collaborators on
    • By considering the current ITM issue, we should put a minimum success of O5 as BRSE+FDsqz (170 Mpc) with DRSE (150 Mpc) as a backup => this is a Broad-band option

    • Define the ultimate goal of KAGRA towards 2030's (until 3G observation starts) with heavy mass (100~200 kg) and high power (350~500 W) laser to achieve 300~500 Mpc sensitivity. => this is a broad-band option

    • The strategy and path between O5 and ultimate can be discussed according to the technological feasibility and science cases
    • White paper 2nd release to be prepared first as an internal document (Oct.~Dec./2019)
    • Then later, we would like to make it as a publication

Agenda

  • Things happened since the last satellite meeting

  • We have a session dedicated to sapphire mirror and heat extraction
    • Understand the current status of sapphire mirror issues and future prospects
    • Maximum laser power is limited (at least) by the heat absorption and heat extraction capacity. We should understand the current estimation.
  • We would like to get agreement/understanding on the followings:
    • Publication on the KAGRA future upgrades
    • Define the ultimate goal in long term towards 2030's
    • More realistic plans for O5
  • Publication plan (Full KAGRA author)
    • Serve as the 2nd release of the white paper
    • Discussion about the ultimate goal and intermediate plants including O5
    • Share the same idea inside the collaboration as well as to inform it to LV and near-by communities
    • Submission/publication target just after KAGRA manage to join O3 (late 2019~early 2020 ?)
    • Target journal: PRL or PRD ? (depending on the number of pages/figures) c.f. iKAGRA => PTEP, bKAGRA-ph1 => CQG

  • Ultimate goal of KAGRA
    • Time scale around 2030
    • It should fill the gap between O5 and 3G
    • 200 kg Sapphire as the primary candidate (iLM may help us a lot if their proposal is accepted)
    • Backup plan with Silicon ? Decision tree should be prepared
    • With 200 kg sapphire and 500 W laser, 500 Mpc may be possible JGW-G1910533

    • What is the name ? Naming is important: hKAGRA ? (hyper-KAGRA, or h as Heavy-mass and High-power), uKAGRA ? (ultimate-KAGRA) or dKAGRA ? (dream-KAGRA)
  • More realistic plans for O5
    • Due to the ITM issues it may be difficult to achieve the design sensitivity during O4
    • One option is to achieve the design sensitivity (with detuning) of 150 Mpc in O5
    • Detuning doesn't go well with squeezing. Should we give up detuning but BRSE with FD squeezing (60m filter cavity ?)
    • High Freq. (HF) upgrade requires R&D and change of suspensions which may have a risk to worsen the sensitivity, while FD squeezing can be installed independently so that we can go back to detuning option if the installation of squeezing doesn't finish in time

LCGT/Meeting/f2f/2019Aug/FuSat (last edited 2019-08-22 17:01:21 by SadakazuHaino)