Differences between revisions 20 and 21
Revision 20 as of 2009-07-10 12:45:10
Size: 2706
Comment:
Revision 21 as of 2009-07-10 12:45:33
Size: 2707
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 17: Line 17:
 *Thomas: Developped by Thomas Cobit. Visual C++ besed, running only Windows machine. This is the first simulation tool which can calculate quantum effect using two-photon mode.  *Thomas: Developped by Thomas Corbit. Visual C++ besed, running only Windows machine. This is the first simulation tool which can calculate quantum effect using two-photon mode.

...Up

Simulation Tools

Name

Platform

Domain

Capabilities

Author

Web

Optickle

Matlab

Frequency Domain

Radiation Pressure, 01 mode

Matt Evans

Password protected

Finesse

C?

Frequency Domain

Higher order modes

Andreas Freise

http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~adf/

e2e

C++, JAVA

Time Domain

Hiro Yamamoto

http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~e2e/


Comparison of simulation tools for LCGT

I am comparing several simulation tools with theoretical line using LCGT 2007 parameters. I used here FINESSE, Thomas, Oprickle. Except for FINESSE, all results matched pretty well within 0.1%-1% accuracy. FINESSE seems to have a bug of a factor by sqrt(2), but it can be compensated later if you know this information.

  • Theoretical: just analytical way shown in LCGT design document on page 14.

  • FINESSE: 'ps2S' and 'scale meter' commands are used for the unit in m/rHz and 'fig' command are used to produce excitations in frequency domain. Compensation factor *sqrt(2) was needed to match other results. This could be a bug.
  • Thomas: Developped by Thomas Corbit. Visual C++ besed, running only Windows machine. This is the first simulation tool which can calculate quantum effect using two-photon mode.
  • Optickle: Very flexible simulation tool. You can use a full set of Matlab functions. This tool also can calculate full quantum effect.

FPMI, no loss case for LCGT parameters

FPMI_noloss.png

20090709_simall_FPMI_noloss.zip

For shotnoise calculation here, just very hevy masses are used in Thomas tool and Optickle.

PRFPMI, no loss case for LCGT parameters

PRFPMI_noloss.png

20090709_simall_PRFPMI_noloss.zip

BRSE, no loss case for LCGT parameters

BRSE_noloss.png

20090709_simall_BRSE_noloss.zip

BRSE, no loss case with radiation pressure noise for LCGT parameters

BRSE_noloss_rad.png

20090709_simall_BRSE_noloss_rad.zip

Optickle uses vacuum injections from dark port and other lossy ports on this model due to introduce quantum noise, so Optickle result with RF detection is worse than other calculation like Thomas's DC readout. Calculation above this model assumed ideal flat shot noise, so all the results were matched well.

BRSE, with loss, radiation pressure noise for LCGT parameters

BRSE_loss_rad.png

20090709_simall_BRSE_loss_rad.zip

LCGT/subgroup/ifo/ISC/Tools (last edited 2015-03-16 18:41:46 by KeikoKokeyama)