|
Size: 1034
Comment:
|
← Revision 7 as of 2020-08-05 14:23:25 ⇥
Size: 1308
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 13: | Line 13: |
| * Implement it to one of the ETMs | * Implement it to one of the ETMs (Nakano, Miyo) |
| Line 15: | Line 15: |
| * If the above works, implement to all the Type-As | * If the above works, implement to all the Type-As (Nakano, Miyo) |
| Line 21: | Line 21: |
| * Integration with Simulation * Import the modal damping for one of the modes to the current model (Shoda) * See if we can reproduce the phase delays between stages by introducing asymmetries in the suspension model (Shoda) |
|
| Line 23: | Line 26: |
| * More detailed calculations with the method described in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09571]] | * More detailed calculations with the method described in [[https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09571]] (Ushiba) |
Type-A control meeting 2020/8/4
Agenda
Control simulation result with the upgraded actuators [Shoda] Slides
Modal damping [Nakano] Slides
Eddy current damping [Ushiba] Slides
A/I
- Modal Damping
- Near term
- Implement it to one of the ETMs (Nakano, Miyo)
- Try lock acquisition
- If the above works, implement to all the Type-As (Nakano, Miyo)
- Then lock PRFPMI and check the low frequency noise
- Implement it to one of the ETMs (Nakano, Miyo)
- Longer term
- If successful with Type-A, implement it to all the other suspensions.
- Improvement
- Form optimal combinations of actuators for each mode
- Integration with Simulation
- Import the modal damping for one of the modes to the current model (Shoda)
- See if we can reproduce the phase delays between stages by introducing asymmetries in the suspension model (Shoda)
- Near term
- Eddy current damping of MN coil bobbins
More detailed calculations with the method described in https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09571 (Ushiba)