|
Size: 1085
Comment:
|
Size: 664
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| . Subject: [LCGT-isc 00258] Re: [LCGT-isc 00254] 論点整理 . From: Hiroaki Yamamoto . To: LCGT-isc at icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp . Cc: Norikatsu Mio . Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:25:20 -0700 </pre> |
== Concern on mirror optical losses by H.Yamamoto == |
| Line 7: | Line 3: |
| * Scattering loss of 45ppm by low-freq (>1mm) surface error of 1nm RMS (25ppm with 0.75nm RMS). * Scattering loss of 6ppm by high-freq (<1mm) surface error of 0.2nm RMS. * Unexplainable punctate scattering loss of 10ppm (realistic estimate would be 15-30ppm). |
|
| Line 8: | Line 7: |
| . 私としては不可能と信じていますが、一応どの様な表面が必要か。 散乱によるロスは * 鏡の長波長(>1 mm) RMS = 1 nm で鏡あたりの散乱損失が '''45ppm'''. 0.75 nm で 25ppm * 鏡の短波長(<1 mm) RMS = 0.2 nm で '''6ppm''' * 訳の分からない点状散乱 '''10ppm''' （神様、仏様に祈ってやっと願いがかなうかどうか、15~30ppm が現実的な値） . この散乱だけで '''61ppm''' (RMS(長波長)=1nm), 41ppm (RMS=0.75nm) |
These alone would make the total scattering loss already 61ppm (with 1nm LF RMS) or 41ppm (with 0.75nm LF RMS). |
| Line 14: | Line 9: |
. シリカの場合、コーティングによる吸収が 0.5ppm 以下が可能と言われているが、表面が汚れると数 ppm 簡単に悪くなる。 . この中で、金と時間で解決できるのが長波長領域での散乱ロス。 LIGO は RMS＜0.5 nm を要求し、 Tinsley がそれより良い研磨を達成している。 |
* Besides, absorption at the coatings, assumed to be 0.5ppm, can go worse by a few ppm easily. * LF RMS could be improved if we spend a lot of money and time. LIGO asked for RMS<0.5nm and Tinsley has achieved that value. |
Concern on mirror optical losses by H.Yamamoto
Scattering loss of 45ppm by low-freq (>1mm) surface error of 1nm RMS (25ppm with 0.75nm RMS).
Scattering loss of 6ppm by high-freq (<1mm) surface error of 0.2nm RMS.
- Unexplainable punctate scattering loss of 10ppm (realistic estimate would be 15-30ppm).
These alone would make the total scattering loss already 61ppm (with 1nm LF RMS) or 41ppm (with 0.75nm LF RMS).
- Besides, absorption at the coatings, assumed to be 0.5ppm, can go worse by a few ppm easily.
LF RMS could be improved if we spend a lot of money and time. LIGO asked for RMS<0.5nm and Tinsley has achieved that value.