Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2018-02-06 09:30:17
Size: 1288
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2018-02-06 10:06:05
Size: 1282
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 28: Line 28:
    * Evacuation might be needed if ETMY is touching somewhere.     * Vent might be needed if ETMY is touching somewhere.

2017/2/6(Tue.)

  • Remote participants by eZuce: Takahashi
  • Report of work (*:responsible person)
    • Alignment and Vibration Isolation: Izumi, Okutomi
      • BF yaw transfer function showed that it did not move well. It was fount that the position of IP was different from when pumping down started.
      • IP drifted 2mm in the air, and another 2mm when pump down. (Takahashi)
      • ETMY IPs were set back to where they were on 1/13. The transfer function now has the similar shape as before, but the Q of lowest peak is a bit low.
  • Work plan (*:responsible person)
    • Alignment and Vibration Isolation: *Izumi
      • We can move moving masses of BF, or IPs of yaw to check TF can be recovered.
      • We will play one more day under vacuum.
    • Type A: *Yokozawa
      • RT model of Type A will be separated into cryopayload and tower.
    • Type B
      • SR assembly continues.
  • Laser hazard: PSL. Green might be used late of the afternoon, then the center area and Y end will be the hazard area.
  • Weekly
    • Week of 2/5
      • Finding causes of ETMY trouble.
        • Vent might be needed if ETMY is touching somewhere.
        • Cooling also will be delayed for 2weeks or so.
  • Issues
    • IP drifted 2mm in the air, and another 2mm when pump down.

KAGRA/Commissioning/DailyWork/2018-02-06 (last edited 2018-02-06 10:06:05 by OsamuMiyakawa)