Differences between revisions 1 and 27 (spanning 26 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2018-05-04 22:56:42
Size: 113
Comment:
Revision 27 as of 2018-05-05 02:58:50
Size: 3285
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:

 * MICH LOCK flag
  * K1:GRD-LSC_LOCK_STATE_N (16Hz sampling)
   * 1000 is operation mode

 * Injection flag
  * (1) K1:CAL-CS_CALHWI_CW_INJ_SW (16Hz sampling, on:1 off:0)
   * Hardware injection switch of CW injection (used in injection flag)
  * (2) K1:CAL-CS_CALHWI_HWINJ_SW (16Hz sampling, on:1 off:0)
   * Hardware injection master switch (used in injection flag)
  * (3) K1:CAL-CS_CALHWI_(X/Y/BS)_GAIN (16Hz sampling)
   * Signal gain to X, Y, BS
  
 * Injection signal
  * (4) K1:CAL-CS_CAL_HWI_HARDWARE_DQ (16kHz sampling)
  * Total amplitude of Hardware injection(CBC+CW+TEST)

 * So, total amplitude of CW injection is
  * (1)*(2)*(3)*(4) [count]
  * But, we should apply transfer function between injection port and displacement of each test mass when evaluating the TM displacement
   * time delay between cal model and BS model (~61usec)
   * digital anti-imaging filter
   * time delay in the BS IOP(shared memory for DAC output) (~61usec)
   * time delay in the DAC output (There is unknown issue) (~60usec???)
    * The detail is summarized in ([[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=6924 | JGWDoc6924]])
   * analog anti-imaging filter
   * Coil driver(The transfer function is still investigated, with connection of coil)
   * Force to length transfer function(1/f^2 for higher frequency)
   * Actuator efficiency (Large measurement uncertainties due to fluctuation of optical gain)

 * Injection method
  * k1script:/users/yokozawa/inj_phase1/inj_dat.sh
  * k1script:/users/yokozawa/inj_phase1/inj_dat2.sh
   * Prepare the dat files before injection, scp from other PC, using awgstream we injected signal.

 * Injection waveforms
  * 15 LIGO injection pulsars([[https://losc.ligo.org/s/injections/o1/cw_injections.html|LIGO O1 CWINJ]])
   * using lalapps_Makefakedta_v5
  * 6 continuous sine
  * Lists of continuous injection
||Pulsar Name||alpha||delta ||cosi||freq||f1dot||psi||phi0||h0[count]||h0[strain]||time shift[sample]||
||P0||1.248816734||-0.981180225||0.794905||265.5771052||-4.15E-12||0.770087086||2.66||94.772316||0||-5||
||P1||0.652645832||-0.514042406||0.4638224||849.0832962||-3.00E-10||0.35603553||1.28||100.0||0||-5||
||P2||3.75692884||0.060108958||-0.928576||575.163573||-1.37E-13||-0.221788475||4.03||100.0||0||-5||
||P3||3.113188712||-0.583578803||0.0||108.8571594||-1.46E-17||0.444280306||5.53||23.460442||0||-5||
||P4||4.886706854||-0.217583646||0.277||1403.163331||-2.54E-08||-0.647939117||4.83||100.0||0||-5||
||P5||5.281831296||-1.463269033||0.463||52.80832436||-4.03E-18||-0.363953188||2.23||10.428252||0||-5||
||P6||6.261385269||-1.14184021||-0.154||148.7190257||-6.73E-09||0.470984879||0.97||23.421977||0||-5||
||P7||3.899512716||-0.356930834||0.7568||1220.979581||-1.12E-09||0.512322887||5.25||100.0||0||-5||
||P8||6.132905166||-0.583263151||0.074||194.3083185||-8.65E-09||0.170470927||5.89||57.916404||0||-5||
||P9||3.471208243||1.321032538||-0.619||763.8473165||-1.45E-17||-0.008560279||1.01||100.0||0||-5||
||P10||3.86687549||0.748350133||-0.9877||26.3589129||-8.50E-11||0.61465097870534||0.11626181938654||14.328620||0||-5||

Summary of Continuous Wave Injection at bKAGRA phase1 operation

  • Worker : T.Yokozawa, A.Miyamoto, T.Sawada
  • MICH LOCK flag
    • K1:GRD-LSC_LOCK_STATE_N (16Hz sampling)
      • 1000 is operation mode
  • Injection flag
    • (1) K1:CAL-CS_CALHWI_CW_INJ_SW (16Hz sampling, on:1 off:0)
      • Hardware injection switch of CW injection (used in injection flag)
    • (2) K1:CAL-CS_CALHWI_HWINJ_SW (16Hz sampling, on:1 off:0)
      • Hardware injection master switch (used in injection flag)
    • (3) K1:CAL-CS_CALHWI_(X/Y/BS)_GAIN (16Hz sampling)
      • Signal gain to X, Y, BS
  • Injection signal
    • (4) K1:CAL-CS_CAL_HWI_HARDWARE_DQ (16kHz sampling)
    • Total amplitude of Hardware injection(CBC+CW+TEST)
  • So, total amplitude of CW injection is
    • (1)*(2)*(3)*(4) [count]
    • But, we should apply transfer function between injection port and displacement of each test mass when evaluating the TM displacement
      • time delay between cal model and BS model (~61usec)
      • digital anti-imaging filter
      • time delay in the BS IOP(shared memory for DAC output) (~61usec)
      • time delay in the DAC output (There is unknown issue) (~60usec???)
      • analog anti-imaging filter
      • Coil driver(The transfer function is still investigated, with connection of coil)
      • Force to length transfer function(1/f^2 for higher frequency)
      • Actuator efficiency (Large measurement uncertainties due to fluctuation of optical gain)
  • Injection method
    • k1script:/users/yokozawa/inj_phase1/inj_dat.sh
    • k1script:/users/yokozawa/inj_phase1/inj_dat2.sh
      • Prepare the dat files before injection, scp from other PC, using awgstream we injected signal.
  • Injection waveforms
    • 15 LIGO injection pulsars(LIGO O1 CWINJ)

      • using lalapps_Makefakedta_v5
    • 6 continuous sine
    • Lists of continuous injection

Pulsar Name

alpha

delta

cosi

freq

f1dot

psi

phi0

h0[count]

h0[strain]

time shift[sample]

P0

1.248816734

-0.981180225

0.794905

265.5771052

-4.15E-12

0.770087086

2.66

94.772316

0

-5

P1

0.652645832

-0.514042406

0.4638224

849.0832962

-3.00E-10

0.35603553

1.28

100.0

0

-5

P2

3.75692884

0.060108958

-0.928576

575.163573

-1.37E-13

-0.221788475

4.03

100.0

0

-5

P3

3.113188712

-0.583578803

0.0

108.8571594

-1.46E-17

0.444280306

5.53

23.460442

0

-5

P4

4.886706854

-0.217583646

0.277

1403.163331

-2.54E-08

-0.647939117

4.83

100.0

0

-5

P5

5.281831296

-1.463269033

0.463

52.80832436

-4.03E-18

-0.363953188

2.23

10.428252

0

-5

P6

6.261385269

-1.14184021

-0.154

148.7190257

-6.73E-09

0.470984879

0.97

23.421977

0

-5

P7

3.899512716

-0.356930834

0.7568

1220.979581

-1.12E-09

0.512322887

5.25

100.0

0

-5

P8

6.132905166

-0.583263151

0.074

194.3083185

-8.65E-09

0.170470927

5.89

57.916404

0

-5

P9

3.471208243

1.321032538

-0.619

763.8473165

-1.45E-17

-0.008560279

1.01

100.0

0

-5

P10

3.86687549

0.748350133

-0.9877

26.3589129

-8.50E-11

0.61465097870534

0.11626181938654

14.328620

0

-5

KAGRA/Commissioning/Phase1/Operation/MeasurementsSummary/CWInjection (last edited 2018-05-07 14:53:29 by TakaakiYokozawa)