Differences between revisions 1 and 5 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2018-04-28 05:16:35
Size: 1914
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2018-05-02 11:53:58
Size: 2703
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
  * Reflection from one end mirror 0.20 mW (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4876)
  * At dark fringe 56 +/- 10 uW (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4903)
Line 9: Line 11:
  * beta = 0.12 (from error signal amplitude), 0.2 (from RF power applied to EOM) (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4876 , http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4907)
Line 26: Line 29:
 * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811)  * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations
 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4909
Line 28: Line 33:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4898
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4899
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4919
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4925
 * seismic attenuation ratio measurements for ETMY and Y
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4927
Line 36: Line 47:
 * Noise budget (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834)  * Noise budget
 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4910
Line 38: Line 51:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4891

Summary of Phase 1 Measurements

  • Summary of Phase 1 measurements for bKAGRA Phase 1 paper.

Basic configurations

Michelson initial alignment

  • details of slit method
  • Tcam and baffle PD performance (details-> Tcam paper)

    • time delay, resolution ...

Installation accuracy

Cryogenics

  • cooling curve (details -> CRY paper)

Suspension characterization

Sensitivity and stability

Seismic noise, arm length drift

KAGRA/Commissioning/Phase1/Operation/MeasurementsSummary (last edited 2018-10-01 20:39:54 by YutaMichimura)