Differences between revisions 13 and 21 (spanning 8 versions)
Revision 13 as of 2018-05-07 09:54:43
Size: 3560
Comment:
Revision 21 as of 2018-05-07 14:21:25
Size: 4156
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4487
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4489
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4527
Line 18: Line 21:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=3848
Line 31: Line 35:
 * alignment drift during the cool down  * alignment drift, height change during the cool down
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4176
Line 53: Line 58:
  * duty factor
   * Total: 68.65%
   * 4/28: 81.66%
   * 4/29: 97.00%
   * 4/30: 90.36%
   * 5/01: 87.09%
   * 5/02: 86.88%
   * 5/03: 19.97%
   * 5/04: 33.58%
   * 5/05: 64.18%
   * 5/06: 55.36%
Line 64: Line 80:
  * difference between iKAGRA and Phase-1?
Line 65: Line 82:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4955
Line 69: Line 87:
 * differential seismic noise measured by Michelson (3-km CMRR)  * differential seismic noise measured by Michelson (3-km CMRR), GIF-X (1.5-km CMRR), IMC (26.65-m CMRR)

Summary of Phase 1 Measurements

  • Summary of Phase 1 measurements for bKAGRA Phase 1 paper.

Basic configurations

Michelson initial alignment

Installation accuracy

Cryogenics

Suspension characterization

Sensitivity and stability

Seismic noise, arm length drift

Hardware injection test

  • CBC injection(2018/4/30 Night shift)
  • CW injection(2018/5/2 Night shift)

KAGRA/Commissioning/Phase1/Operation/MeasurementsSummary (last edited 2018-10-01 20:39:54 by YutaMichimura)