Differences between revisions 22 and 29 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 22 as of 2018-05-07 15:12:48
Size: 4842
Comment:
Revision 29 as of 2018-05-08 15:39:42
Size: 5264
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * input power  * input power [Kokeyama, Nakano]
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4377
  * IMC coupling ratio is (1.20-0.72) / (1.20 - 0.25) = 51 %
Line 13: Line 15:
   * RFPD transimpedance measurement was done with RFPD with different S/N.
Line 59: Line 62:
  * for BS [Fujii]
Line 77: Line 81:
  * Michelson was lockable if ETMX/Y angular fluctuation is less than a few urad. Earthquakes shook ETMY to O(100) urad.
Line 101: Line 106:
== Data acquisition, data transfer ==
 * latency, speed, total amount

Summary of Phase 1 Measurements

  • Summary of Phase 1 measurements for bKAGRA Phase 1 paper.

Basic configurations

Michelson initial alignment

  • details of slit method
  • Tcam and baffle PD performance (details-> Tcam paper)

    • Tcam update frequency ~1sec, resolution [Inoue]
    • Tcam resolution?
    • successfully monitored the beam under cryo baffles/shields

Installation accuracy

Cryogenics

  • cooling curve (details -> CRY paper) [Hasegawa?]

    • Platform, MN, IM, TM, shields
  • alignment drift, height change during the cool down

Suspension characterization

Sensitivity and stability

Seismic noise, arm length drift

Data acquisition, data transfer

  • latency, speed, total amount

Hardware injection test

  • CBC injection(2018/4/30 Night shift)
  • CW injection(2018/5/2 Night shift)

KAGRA/Commissioning/Phase1/Operation/MeasurementsSummary (last edited 2018-10-01 20:39:54 by YutaMichimura)