Differences between revisions 3 and 5 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2018-04-30 13:11:05
Size: 2211
Editor: KousekiMiyo
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2018-05-02 11:53:58
Size: 2703
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 11: Line 11:
  * beta = 0.058 (from error signal amplitude), 0.2 (from RF power applied to EOM) (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4876)   * beta = 0.12 (from error signal amplitude), 0.2 (from RF power applied to EOM) (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4876 , http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4907)
Line 29: Line 29:
 * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811)  * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations
 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4909
Line 31: Line 33:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4898
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4899
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4919
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4925
 * seismic attenuation ratio measurements for ETMY and Y
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4927
Line 39: Line 47:
 * Noise budget (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834)  * Noise budget
 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4910
Line 41: Line 51:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4891

Summary of Phase 1 Measurements

  • Summary of Phase 1 measurements for bKAGRA Phase 1 paper.

Basic configurations

Michelson initial alignment

  • details of slit method
  • Tcam and baffle PD performance (details-> Tcam paper)

    • time delay, resolution ...

Installation accuracy

Cryogenics

  • cooling curve (details -> CRY paper)

Suspension characterization

Sensitivity and stability

Seismic noise, arm length drift

KAGRA/Commissioning/Phase1/Operation/MeasurementsSummary (last edited 2018-10-01 20:39:54 by YutaMichimura)