Differences between revisions 4 and 6 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 4 as of 2018-04-30 15:37:50
Size: 2255
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2018-05-04 11:59:52
Size: 2807
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
  * succeefully monitored the beam under cryo baffles/shields
Line 27: Line 28:
 * alignment drift during the cool down
Line 29: Line 31:
 * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811)  * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations
 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4909
Line 31: Line 35:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4898
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4899
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4919
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4925
 * seismic attenuation ratio measurements for ETMY and Y
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4927
Line 39: Line 49:
 * Noise budget (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834)  * Noise budget
 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4910
Line 41: Line 53:
  * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4891

Summary of Phase 1 Measurements

  • Summary of Phase 1 measurements for bKAGRA Phase 1 paper.

Basic configurations

Michelson initial alignment

  • details of slit method
  • Tcam and baffle PD performance (details-> Tcam paper)

    • time delay, resolution ...
    • succeefully monitored the beam under cryo baffles/shields

Installation accuracy

Cryogenics

  • cooling curve (details -> CRY paper)

  • alignment drift during the cool down

Suspension characterization

Sensitivity and stability

Seismic noise, arm length drift

KAGRA/Commissioning/Phase1/Operation/MeasurementsSummary (last edited 2018-10-01 20:39:54 by YutaMichimura)