Size: 2255
Comment:
|
Size: 3226
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
* signal chain (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4920) | |
Line 19: | Line 20: |
* succeefully monitored the beam under cryo baffles/shields | |
Line 27: | Line 29: |
* alignment drift during the cool down | |
Line 29: | Line 32: |
* length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811) | * length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4909 |
Line 31: | Line 36: |
* http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4898 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4899 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4919 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4925 * seismic attenuation ratio measurements for ETMY and Y * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4927 |
|
Line 37: | Line 48: |
* visibility and optical gain drift (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4775) | * visibility and optical gain drift * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4775 |
Line 39: | Line 51: |
* Noise budget (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834) | * Noise budget * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4834 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4910 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4944 |
Line 41: | Line 56: |
* http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4891 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4933 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4871 * http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4940 |
|
Line 44: | Line 63: |
* http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4942 | |
Line 46: | Line 66: |
== Hardware injection test == * CBC injection(2018/4/30 Night shift) * CW injection(2018/5/2 Night shift) |
Summary of Phase 1 Measurements
- Summary of Phase 1 measurements for bKAGRA Phase 1 paper.
Basic configurations
- input power
- power at detection RF PD
Reflection from one end mirror 0.20 mW (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4876)
At dark fringe 56 +/- 10 uW (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4903)
signal chain (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4920)
- modulation frequency, modulation depth
16.87293 MHz (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4831)
beta = 0.12 (from error signal amplitude), 0.2 (from RF power applied to EOM) (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4876 , http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4907)
- vacuum level
- suspension and coil driver configurations (difference between the final configuration)
Michelson initial alignment
- details of slit method
Tcam and baffle PD performance (details-> Tcam paper)
- time delay, resolution ...
- succeefully monitored the beam under cryo baffles/shields
Installation accuracy
- Schunupp asymmetry measurement
- IMC length measurement
53.30299(2) m (http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4831)
Cryogenics
cooling curve (details -> CRY paper)
- alignment drift during the cool down
Suspension characterization
- length actuation efficiency measurements for BS, comparison with expectations
- length actuation efficiency measurements for ETMX and Y, comparison with expectations
- seismic attenuation ratio measurements for ETMY and Y
- TF difference between ETMX and ETMY (room temperature and cryogenic)
- vertical to length coupling, other coupling measurements
Sensitivity and stability
- actuation efficiency drift
- alignment drift of suspensions
- visibility and optical gain drift
sensitivity stability, duty factor, lock duration (similar plots in https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5177)
- Noise budget
magnetic and acoustic noise from PEM injection (details -> PEM paper?)
Seismic noise, arm length drift
seismic spectra stability (similar plots in https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=2971)
- differential seismic noise measured by Michelson (3-km CMRR)
- differential arm length drift, correlation between GIF-X
Hardware injection test
- CBC injection(2018/4/30 Night shift)
- CW injection(2018/5/2 Night shift)