Size: 1146
Comment:
|
Size: 1712
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
* Attendance: Miyakawa * eZuce: |
* Attendance: Miyakawa, Yamamoto, Aso * eZuce: Suzuki, Hirose, Yokozawa, Izumi, Ushiba |
Line 8: | Line 8: |
* 5/28 extension meeting | |
Line 10: | Line 11: |
== 1. Report of work of the last week and plan of work == | == 1. Discussion after operation == |
Line 12: | Line 13: |
* IFO, ETMs: *Izumi, Enomono * Alignment work is mainly done. 3 DOF of alignment is contolled * Typical locking time is ~several hours. Longest was 10 hours or something. * iKAGRA Guardian code was mainly reused and modified. |
* IFO, ETMs: Izumi, Yamamoto * Well done! Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-5days, and 15-60% in 6-9days. * IMC was quite stable. * ETMY was dominant for stability of IFO in the last 4 days. * Optical gain fluctuated 20~30% due to the contrast defect. * BS coupling between L to P and Y was sometimes dominant for the contrast. * Error of Sunup asymmetry was also dominant by optical gain. |
Line 17: | Line 21: |
* DAQ * DAC of PR3 was dead. Restarting k1pr3 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause. * Timing of dc0 sometimes shifted. Restart daqd of k1dc0 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause. * Diaggui calculates float and sometimes coherence could not be measured. * We switched VIS models to 2kHz to avoid glitches. |
|
Line 18: | Line 27: |
== 2. Discussion after the phase 1 including operation == | * Satellite box should be replaced to have more capacitance. |
Line 20: | Line 29: |
* Well done! * Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-4days, and 15-60% in 5-9days. * IMC was quite stable. |
== 2. Discussion after phase1 == |
Line 24: | Line 31: |
* Troubles: * ETMY * ETMX * IFO * CAL * DAQ * DAC of PR3 was dead. That was the biggest trouble. * VAC * CRY |
* ETM leak was triggered 1week delay. * Records of opening flange are very important. * Manual for VIS and clean booth should be prepared. * Mirror schedule should be checked frequently. * |
Minute of KAGRA commissioning meeting
- Date: 2018/5/8 11AM~12PM
- Attendance: Miyakawa, Yamamoto, Aso
- eZuce: Suzuki, Hirose, Yokozawa, Izumi, Ushiba
- 5/28 extension meeting
1. Discussion after operation
- IFO, ETMs: Izumi, Yamamoto
- Well done! Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-5days, and 15-60% in 6-9days.
- IMC was quite stable.
- ETMY was dominant for stability of IFO in the last 4 days.
- Optical gain fluctuated 20~30% due to the contrast defect.
- BS coupling between L to P and Y was sometimes dominant for the contrast.
- Error of Sunup asymmetry was also dominant by optical gain.
- DAQ
- DAC of PR3 was dead. Restarting k1pr3 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause.
- Timing of dc0 sometimes shifted. Restart daqd of k1dc0 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause.
- Diaggui calculates float and sometimes coherence could not be measured.
- We switched VIS models to 2kHz to avoid glitches.
- Satellite box should be replaced to have more capacitance.
2. Discussion after phase1
- ETM leak was triggered 1week delay.
- Records of opening flange are very important.
- Manual for VIS and clean booth should be prepared.
- Mirror schedule should be checked frequently.
3. Phase 2
- Each stage and target
3. Tasks or discussions
- 5/28 extend chief meeting for looking back phase 1.
Others
- Baffle at ETMX will extracted in the week of 5/7, and it will be black coated.
- Next meeting: 5/8.
1. Discussion after the phase 1 including operation
- IFO
- LSC, CAL etc.
- damping
- DAQ
- Cryogenic
- Vacuum