Differences between revisions 3 and 24 (spanning 21 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2018-05-08 10:58:06
Size: 940
Comment:
Revision 24 as of 2018-05-08 12:20:02
Size: 1886
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Attendance: Miyakawa
  * eZuce:
 * Attendance: Miyakawa, Yamamoto, Aso
  * eZuce: Suzuki, Hirose, Yokozawa, Izumi, Ushiba
Line 10: Line 9:
== 1. Report of work of the last week and plan of work == == 1. Discussion after operation ==
Line 12: Line 11:
 * IFO, ETMs: *Izumi, Enomono  * IFO, ETMs: Izumi, Yamamoto
  * Well done! Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-5days, and 15-60% in 6-9days.
  * IMC was quite stable.
  * ETMY was dominant for stability of IFO in the last 4 days.
  * Optical gain fluctuated 20~30% due to the contrast defect.
  * BS coupling between L to P and Y was sometimes dominant for the contrast.
  * Error of Sunup asymmetry was also dominant by optical gain.
Line 14: Line 19:
 * DAQ
  * DAC of PR3 was dead. Restarting k1pr3 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause.
  * Timing of dc0 sometimes shifted. Restart daqd of k1dc0 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause.
  * Diaggui calculates float and sometimes coherence could not be measured.
  * We switched VIS models to 2kHz to avoid glitches.
Line 15: Line 25:
== 2. Discussion after the phase 1 including operation ==  * Satellite box should be replaced to have more capacitance.
Line 17: Line 27:
 * Well done!
  * Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-4days, and 15-60% in 5-9days.
  * IMC was quite stable.
== 2. Discussion after phase1 ==
Line 21: Line 29:
 * Troubles:
  * ETMY
  * ETMX
  * IFO
  * CAL
  * DAQ
   * DAC of PR3 was dead. That was the biggest trouble.
  * VAC
  * CRY
 * ETM leak was triggered 1week delay.
  * Records of opening flange are very important.
 * Manual for VIS and clean booth should be prepared.
 * Mirror schedule should be checked frequently.
 * Optimization of Each DOF of VIS takes 1 day, full VIS take 22 days.

 * Hammaring test of ETMY showed that something hitting.
  * Cable was well placed for ETMX. Fixing ETMY should be scheduled. (Ushiba)
  * Heat link might be causes of fluctuation. It should be compared with ETMX.
 * Needs ETMX cleaning. (Aso, Izumi, Hirose)

 * TF of ETMY BF should be measured. (Izumi)
 * Cross coupling of ETMY was large. (Izumi)
Line 34: Line 46:
  *

  * Name of "Stage" should be replaced.
Line 38: Line 48:
== 3. Tasks or discussions ==
Line 45: Line 53:
 * Baffle at ETMX will extracted in the week of 5/7, and it will be black coated.

 * Next meeting: 5/8.



== 1. Discussion after the phase 1 including operation ==
 * IFO
  * LSC, CAL etc.
 * damping
 * DAQ
 *Cryogenic
 * Vacuum
 * Next meeting: 5/15.

Minute of KAGRA commissioning meeting


  • Date: 2018/5/8 11AM~12PM
  • Attendance: Miyakawa, Yamamoto, Aso
    • eZuce: Suzuki, Hirose, Yokozawa, Izumi, Ushiba


1. Discussion after operation

  • IFO, ETMs: Izumi, Yamamoto
    • Well done! Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-5days, and 15-60% in 6-9days.
    • IMC was quite stable.
    • ETMY was dominant for stability of IFO in the last 4 days.
    • Optical gain fluctuated 20~30% due to the contrast defect.
    • BS coupling between L to P and Y was sometimes dominant for the contrast.
    • Error of Sunup asymmetry was also dominant by optical gain.
  • DAQ
    • DAC of PR3 was dead. Restarting k1pr3 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause.
    • Timing of dc0 sometimes shifted. Restart daqd of k1dc0 fixed this problem. We are not sure the cause.
    • Diaggui calculates float and sometimes coherence could not be measured.
    • We switched VIS models to 2kHz to avoid glitches.
  • Satellite box should be replaced to have more capacitance.

2. Discussion after phase1

  • ETM leak was triggered 1week delay.
    • Records of opening flange are very important.
  • Manual for VIS and clean booth should be prepared.
  • Mirror schedule should be checked frequently.
  • Optimization of Each DOF of VIS takes 1 day, full VIS take 22 days.
  • Hammaring test of ETMY showed that something hitting.
    • Cable was well placed for ETMX. Fixing ETMY should be scheduled. (Ushiba)
    • Heat link might be causes of fluctuation. It should be compared with ETMX.
  • Needs ETMX cleaning. (Aso, Izumi, Hirose)
  • TF of ETMY BF should be measured. (Izumi)
  • Cross coupling of ETMY was large. (Izumi)

3. Phase 2

  • Each stage and target
    • Name of "Stage" should be replaced.
  • 5/28 extend chief meeting for looking back phase 1.

Others

  • Next meeting: 5/15.

KAGRA/Commissioning/Weekly/20180508/Minute (last edited 2018-05-08 12:20:02 by OsamuMiyakawa)