Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2018-05-08 11:11:49
Size: 1247
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2018-05-08 11:12:52
Size: 1312
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
  * Error of Sunup asymmetry was also dominant by optical gain.

Minute of KAGRA commissioning meeting


  • Date: 2018/5/8 11AM~12PM
  • Attendance: Miyakawa, Yamamoto, Aso
    • eZuce: Suzuki, Hirose, Yokozawa
  • 5/28 extension meeting


1. Report of work of the last week and plan of work

  • IFO, ETMs: *Izumi, Enomono
    • Well done! Duty cycle is 80-90% in 1-5days, and 15-60% in 6-9days.
    • IMC was quite stable.
    • ETMY was dominant for stability of IFO in the last 4 days.
    • Optical gain fluctuated 20~30% due to the contrast defect.
    • BS coupling between L to P and Y was sometimes dominant for the contrast.
    • Error of Sunup asymmetry was also dominant by optical gain.
  • Operation
    • Almost done.

2. Discussion after the phase 1 including operation

  • Troubles:
    • ETMY
    • ETMX
    • IFO
    • CAL
    • DAQ
      • DAC of PR3 was dead. That was the biggest trouble.
    • VAC
    • CRY

3. Phase 2

  • Each stage and target

3. Tasks or discussions

  • 5/28 extend chief meeting for looking back phase 1.

Others

  • Baffle at ETMX will extracted in the week of 5/7, and it will be black coated.
  • Next meeting: 5/8.

1. Discussion after the phase 1 including operation

  • IFO
    • LSC, CAL etc.
  • damping
  • DAQ
  • Cryogenic
  • Vacuum

KAGRA/Commissioning/Weekly/20180508/Minute (last edited 2018-05-08 12:20:02 by OsamuMiyakawa)