Differences between revisions 10 and 11
⇤ ← Revision 10 as of 2019-12-21 01:49:23 →
Size: 3138
Editor: HideyukiTagoshi
Comment:
← Revision 11 as of 2019-12-23 13:42:03 → ⇥
Size: 3242
Editor: HideyukiTagoshi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 29: Line 29:
      * Has the average range changed significantly?  * Has the average range changed significantly?
Line 31: Line 31:
      * Is the number of character of the range drop events significantly different?  * Is the number and character of the range drop events, significantly differ?
     (To check how each range drop event behaves)
Line 33: Line 34:
   * Are there any significant changes in the glitchgram?     * Are there any significant changes in the glitchgram?
Line 35: Line 36:
      * Is any new or unexpected noise visible in the h(t) spectrogram?  * Is any new or unexpected noise visible in the h(t) spectrogram?
Line 37: Line 38:
      * Are there any anomalies in the glitch rate for loud glitches?  * Are there any anomalies in the glitch rate for loud glitches?
Line 42: Line 43:
      * Is there anything unusual in the hourly glitchgrams?  * Is there anything unusual in the hourly glitchgrams?
Line 47: Line 48:
      * Is there anything unusual in the hourly h(t) spectrograms?  * Is there anything unusual in the hourly h(t) spectrograms?
Line 52: Line 53:
      * Do any seismic gestures (earthquakes, anthrogrogenic etc..) appear to  * Do any seismic gestures (earthquakes, anthrogrogenic etc..) appear to correlate with noise in h(t)?
Line 54: Line 55:
   * correlate with noise in h(t)?

   * PEM - all but especially seismic and acoustic
  * PEM - all but especially seismic and acoustic
Line 60: Line 58:
 • Hveto
Line 61: Line 60:
  * Hveto    * hVeto finds correlations between the h(t) glitches and glitches in other channels.
  Classes of glitches that might have the same cause are thus identified. “Significance”
  measures the strength of a correlation. Are any of the most significant channels different
  from those of the previous days or shifts?
Line 63: Line 65:
    * Are any of the most significant channels different from those of the previous days or shift. If yes, are there many other significant channels associated with the new channel(s). Are the associated channels ones

  * Fscan
    * Check for a new or disappeared lines, note down line information such as frequency, transition time		  • Fscan
  Check for a new or disappeared lines, note down line information such as frequency, transition time

Shift tasks related with DetChar

Task No.

Theme

Substance

1.

Check SummaryPage works or not

See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/monitoring/
Status should be OK

2.

Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition

See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/
When you find some transitions, post to klog

3.

Check Spectral line noise (Yesterday)

See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/yesterday/detchar/fscan/
When you find new or disappeared lines, post line information (frequency, transition time, etc.) to klog

4.

Check Lockloss data

See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/
We can get the GPS time list at lockloss (GPS end)

Additional trial

  • Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition

    • Let's investigate the noise source which caused such a transition.

      Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Bruco] (See JGW-G1809081)

  • Check Spectral line noise

    • Let's investigate the frequency, stability with more fine frequency resolution.

      Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Mnitors] -> [DARM lines]

  • Check Lockloss data

    • Let's investigate the localsss causes.

      Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Lockloss]

New suggestions for Detchar shift

You should change the interferometer state from ‘Locked’ to ‘Observing’ before checking the below details:

  • Summary
    • Has the average range changed significantly?
    • Is the number and character of the range drop events, significantly differ?
      • (To check how each range drop event behaves)
    • Are there any significant changes in the glitchgram?
      • Is any new or unexpected noise visible in the h(t) spectrogram?
      • Are there any anomalies in the glitch rate for loud glitches?
  • Lock/Sensitivity/glitches
    • Is there anything unusual in the hourly glitchgrams?
  • Lock/Sensitivity/strain
    • Is there anything unusual in the hourly h(t) spectrograms?
  • SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview
    • Do any seismic gestures (earthquakes, anthrogrogenic etc..) appear to correlate with noise in h(t)?
    • PEM - all but especially seismic and acoustic
    • Are there any significant changes, especially new features, in the PEM channels?
      • • Hveto
        • hVeto finds correlations between the h(t) glitches and glitches in other channels.
          • Classes of glitches that might have the same cause are thus identified. “Significance” measures the strength of a correlation. Are any of the most significant channels different from those of the previous days or shifts?
        • Fscan
        • Check for a new or disappeared lines, note down line information such as frequency, transition time

KAGRA/EngineeringRun/ER191217_24/DetChar (last edited 2019-12-25 13:21:27 by miyoki)