Size: 902
Comment:
|
← Revision 20 as of 2019-12-25 13:21:27 ⇥
Size: 3577
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
||<#AAFFC3 style="text-align:center; "> '''Theme''' ||<#AAFFC3 style="text-align:center; "> '''Substance''' || || Check SummaryPage works or not || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/monitoring/ <<BR>>Status should be OK || || Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/ <<BR>>When you find some transitions, post to klog || || Check Spectral lines noise || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/detchar/fscan/ <<BR>>When you find new or disappeared lines, post line information (frequency, transition time, etc.) to klog || || Check Lockloss data || || || Something || || || Anything || || |
||<#AAFFC3 style="text-align:center; "> '''Task No.''' ||<#AAFFC3 style="text-align:center; "> '''Theme''' ||<#AAFFC3 style="text-align:center; "> '''Substance''' || ||1. || Check SummaryPage works or not || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/monitoring/ <<BR>>Status should be OK || ||2. || Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/ <<BR>>When you find some transitions, post to [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/|klog]] || ||3. || Check Spectral line noise (Yesterday) || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/yesterday/detchar/fscan/ <<BR>>When you find new or disappeared lines, post line information (frequency, transition time, etc.) to [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/|klog]] || ||4. || Check Lockloss data || See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/ <<BR>>We can get the GPS time list at lockloss (GPS end)|| ||5. || DetChar Reports during ER1 || [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12282 | klog12282]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12275 | klog12275]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12264 | klog12264]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12257 | klog12257]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12205 | klog12205]]|| === Additional trial === * '''Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition''' Let's investigate the noise source which caused such a transition. Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Bruco] (See [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=9081|JGW-G1809081]]) * '''Check Spectral line noise''' Let's investigate the frequency, stability with more fine frequency resolution. Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Mnitors] -> [DARM lines] * '''Check Lockloss data''' Let's investigate the localsss causes. Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Lockloss] === New suggestions for Detchar shift === You should change the interferometer state from ‘Locked’ to ‘Observing’ before checking the below details: * Summary * Has the average range changed significantly? * Is the number and character of the range drop events, significantly differ? (To check how each range drop event behaves) * Are there any significant changes in the glitchgram? * Is any new or unexpected noise visible in the h(t) spectrogram? * Are there any anomalies in the glitch rate for loud glitches? * Lock/Sensitivity/glitches * Is there anything unusual in the hourly glitchgrams? * Lock/Sensitivity/strain * Is there anything unusual in the hourly h(t) spectrograms? * SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview * Do any seismic gestures (earthquakes, anthrogrogenic etc..) appear to correlate with noise in h(t)? * PEM - all but especially seismic and acoustic * Are there any significant changes, especially new features, in the PEM channels? * Hveto * Hveto finds correlations between the h(t) glitches and glitches in other channels. Classes of glitches that might have the same cause are thus identified. “Significance” measures the strength of a correlation. Are any of the most significant channels different from those of the previous days or shifts? * Fscan Check for a new or disappeared lines, note down line information such as frequency, transition time |
Shift tasks related with DetChar
Task No. |
Theme |
Substance |
1. |
Check SummaryPage works or not |
See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/monitoring/ |
2. |
Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition |
See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/ |
3. |
Check Spectral line noise (Yesterday) |
See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/yesterday/detchar/fscan/ |
4. |
Check Lockloss data |
See https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/today/ |
5. |
DetChar Reports during ER1 |
Additional trial
Check Sensitivity & Binary range transition
- Let's investigate the noise source which caused such a transition.
Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Bruco] (See JGW-G1809081)
- Let's investigate the noise source which caused such a transition.
Check Spectral line noise
- Let's investigate the frequency, stability with more fine frequency resolution.
Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Mnitors] -> [DARM lines]
- Let's investigate the frequency, stability with more fine frequency resolution.
Check Lockloss data
- Let's investigate the localsss causes.
Open sitemap and access [sitemap] -> [DetChar] -> [Lockloss]
- Let's investigate the localsss causes.
New suggestions for Detchar shift
You should change the interferometer state from ‘Locked’ to ‘Observing’ before checking the below details:
- Summary
- Has the average range changed significantly?
- Is the number and character of the range drop events, significantly differ?
- (To check how each range drop event behaves)
- Are there any significant changes in the glitchgram?
- Is any new or unexpected noise visible in the h(t) spectrogram?
- Are there any anomalies in the glitch rate for loud glitches?
- Lock/Sensitivity/glitches
- Is there anything unusual in the hourly glitchgrams?
- Lock/Sensitivity/strain
- Is there anything unusual in the hourly h(t) spectrograms?
- SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview
- Do any seismic gestures (earthquakes, anthrogrogenic etc..) appear to correlate with noise in h(t)?
- PEM - all but especially seismic and acoustic
- Are there any significant changes, especially new features, in the PEM channels?
- Hveto
- Hveto finds correlations between the h(t) glitches and glitches in other channels. Classes of glitches that might have the same cause are thus identified. “Significance” measures the strength of a correlation. Are any of the most significant channels different from those of the previous days or shifts?
- Fscan
- Check for a new or disappeared lines, note down line information such as frequency, transition time