Differences between revisions 25 and 51 (spanning 26 versions)
Revision 25 as of 2024-03-22 07:34:42
Size: 2993
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Revision 51 as of 2024-03-22 13:54:24
Size: 3966
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
IMC Ecovery(20240322) IMC recovery(20240322)
Line 5: Line 5:
  * Electrical wirings
   * Coil resistances and inductances
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914
   * Fixing on tables is tight and reliable?
Line 16: Line 7:
    *
   * Smooth Mag-coil motion and balance and TFs
    * balance can be adjusted after closing?
    * Health MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28890
    * Health MCi: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28889
    * Health MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28915
   * Gaps between magnets and coils
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> A.I. upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth pico.
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909 -> A.I. upload picth, yaw pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth, yaw pico.
   * Gaps between magnets and coils -> MCo uppper is the minimum, but this is the best effort.
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors -> confirmed less than 1mm.
Line 26: Line 13:
  * Electrical wirings
   * Coil resistances and inductances -> inductances shoulg refer the past data if coil did not change, or it will be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668 -> MCo H4 looks high, it could be disconnection. It should be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning).
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696 -> One of the MCi resistance is low, but low may has no problem. If it is high, it may have some disconnection.
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil) -> MCi could not be accessed.
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911 -> improved
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910 -> improved
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914 -> this does not matter for the suspension.
   * Fixing on tables is tight and reliable?
  * Smooth Mag-coil motion and balance and TFs
   * balance can be adjusted after closing?
   * MCi: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28938
   * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28939
   * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940 -> Peak of pitch shifted to higher frequency from result of Feb.2. Needs centering for the Oplev.
Line 46: Line 47:
 *Beam damping(T.Akutsu)  *Beam dump(T.Akutsu)
Line 50: Line 51:
  * Beam dampers were additionally added?   * Beam dumps were additionally added?
Line 66: Line 67:


------
??? Recovery(202404??)
------



------
??? Recovery(202404??)
------


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


??? Recovery(202404??)



??? Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)