Differences between revisions 33 and 69 (spanning 36 versions)
Revision 33 as of 2024-03-22 12:52:20
Size: 3187
Comment:
Revision 69 as of 2024-04-02 15:34:39
Size: 5196
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909
   * Smooth Mag-coil motion and balance and TFs
    * balance can be adjusted after closing?
    * Health MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911
    * Health MCi: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910
    * Health MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28915
   * Gaps between magnets and coils
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> --(A.I. upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth pico.)-- -> https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28941
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909 -> --(A.I. upload pitch, yaw pico pictures (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for pitch, yaw pico.)-- -> https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28941
   * Gaps between magnets and coils -> MCo upper is the minimum, but this is the best effort.
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors -> confirmed less than 1mm.
Line 19: Line 14:
   * Coil resistances and inductances
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914
   * Coil resistances and inductances -> A.I. Inductances should refer the past data if the coil did not change, or it will be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668 -> A.I. MCo H4 looks high, it could be disconnection. It should be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning).
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696 -> One of the MCi resistances is low, but low may have no problem. If it is high, it may have some disconnection.
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil) -> MCi could not be accessed.
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911 -> improved
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910 -> improved
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914 -> this does not matter for the suspension.
Line 27: Line 22:
  * Smooth Mag-coil motion and balance and TFs
   * balance can be adjusted after closing?
   * MCi: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28938
   * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28939
   * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940 -> A.I. Peak of pitch shifted to higher frequency from result of Feb.2. Needs remote centering for the Oplev first (Ushiba).
Line 39: Line 39:
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28937
Line 52: Line 53:
   * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931    * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931 -> Inside of beam duct between PSL and iMC looks shining.
Line 56: Line 57:
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom?
  * Leak point was fastened tightly?
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom? -> A.I. before closing.
  * Leak point was fastened tightly? -> A.I. when closing.
Line 59: Line 60:
  * MCE trans flange rotation (the past activity is in https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28326)   * MCE trans flange rotation (the past activity is in https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28326) -> it will be done on Mon.
Line 62: Line 63:
  * FFU stop for the MCE/MCREFL optical table and reconstruction of the window shield (MCE, MCF?).   * FFU stop for the MCE/MCREFL optical table and reconstruction of the window shield (MCE, MCF?). -> measurement of length of legs.
Line 69: Line 70:
------
??? Recovery(202404??)
------
----
Summary
----
 * TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
 * All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
  * The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
  * Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
  * Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
  * Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.
Line 74: Line 81:
------
X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)
------
 * [[ https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=15709 | Dan's presentation files ]]
  * Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
  * 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April.


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


Summary


  • TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
  • All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
    • The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
    • Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
    • Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
    • Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.


X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)


  • Dan's presentation files

    • Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
    • 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April.


??? Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)