Differences between revisions 34 and 57 (spanning 23 versions)
Revision 34 as of 2024-03-22 12:54:13
Size: 3373
Comment:
Revision 57 as of 2024-03-22 14:23:01
Size: 4158
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909
   * Smooth Mag-coil motion and balance and TFs
    * balance can be adjusted after closing?
    * Health MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911
    * Health MCi: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910
    * Health MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28915
   * Gaps between magnets and coils
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> --(A.I. upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth pico.)--
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909 -> --(A.I. upload picth, yaw pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth, yaw pico.)--
   * Gaps between magnets and coils -> MCo uppper is the minimum, but this is the best effort.
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors -> confirmed less than 1mm.
Line 19: Line 14:
   * Coil resistances and inductances
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914
   * Coil resistances and inductances -> inductances shoulg refer the past data if coil did not change, or it will be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668 -> MCo H4 looks high, it could be disconnection. It should be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning).
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696 -> One of the MCi resistance is low, but low may has no problem. If it is high, it may have some disconnection.
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil) -> MCi could not be accessed.
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911 -> improved
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910 -> improved
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914 -> this does not matter for the suspension.
Line 27: Line 22:
  * Health check   * Smooth Mag-coil motion and balance and TFs
   * balance can be adjusted after closing?
Line 30: Line 26:
   * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940 -> Peak of pitch shifted to higher frequency from result of Feb.2. Needs remote centering for the Oplev first (Ushiba).
Line 43: Line 39:
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28937
Line 56: Line 53:
   * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931    * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931 -> Inside of beam duct between PSL and iMC looks shining.
Line 60: Line 57:
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom?
  * Leak point was fastened tightly?
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom? -> A.I. before closing.
  * Leak point was fastened tightly? -> A.I. before closing.


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


??? Recovery(202404??)



??? Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)