Differences between revisions 37 and 72 (spanning 35 versions)
Revision 37 as of 2024-03-22 13:10:02
Size: 3204
Comment:
Revision 72 as of 2024-04-04 11:19:31
Size: 5476
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi)
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909
   * Gaps between magnets and coils
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> --(A.I. upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth pico.)-- -> https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28941
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909 -> --(A.I. upload pitch, yaw pico pictures (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for pitch, yaw pico.)-- -> https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28941
   * Gaps between magnets and coils -> MCo upper is the minimum, but this is the best effort.
   * Gaps between EQ stoppers and mirrors -> confirmed less than 1mm.
Line 14: Line 14:
   * Coil resistances and inductances
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914
   * Coil resistances and inductances -> A.I. Inductances should refer the past data if the coil did not change, or it will be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668 -> A.I. MCo H4 looks high, it could be disconnection. It should be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning).
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696 -> One of the MCi resistances is low, but low may have no problem. If it is high, it may have some disconnection.
   * Isolation of Wiring from coils to flanges(pico and mag-coil) -> MCi could not be accessed.
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28911 -> improved
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28910 -> improved
    * POM: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28914 -> this does not matter for the suspension.
Line 26: Line 26:
   * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940 -> A.I. Peak of pitch shifted to higher frequency from result of Feb.2. Needs remote centering for the Oplev first (Ushiba).
Line 39: Line 39:
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28937
Line 52: Line 53:
   * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931    * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931 -> Inside of beam duct between PSL and iMC looks shining.
Line 56: Line 57:
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom?
  * Leak point was fastened tightly?
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom? -> A.I. before closing.
  * Leak point was fastened tightly? -> A.I. when closing.
Line 59: Line 60:
  * MCE trans flange rotation (the past activity is in https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28326)   * MCE trans flange rotation (the past activity is in https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28326) -> it will be done on Mon.
Line 62: Line 63:
  * FFU stop for the MCE/MCREFL optical table and reconstruction of the window shield (MCE, MCF?).   * FFU stop for the MCE/MCREFL optical table and reconstruction of the window shield (MCE, MCF?). -> measurement of length of legs.
Line 69: Line 70:
----
Summary
----
 * TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
 * All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
  * The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
  * Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
  * Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
  * Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.

Line 70: Line 82:
??? Recovery(202404??) X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)
------
 * [[ https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=15709 | Dan's presentation files ]]
  * Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
  * 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April. --> [[ https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29065 | klog#29065 ]]
  * Pcal-X noise in the Cal line is OK? --> [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29075 | klog#29075 ]]

------
EXC Recovery(202404??)
Line 75: Line 95:

Line 76: Line 98:
??? Recovery(202404??) *** Recovery(202404??)
Line 78: Line 100:





------
*** Recovery(202404??)
------


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


Summary


  • TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
  • All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
    • The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
    • Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
    • Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
    • Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.


X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)


  • Dan's presentation files

    • Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
    • 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April. --> klog#29065

    • Pcal-X noise in the Cal line is OK? --> klog#29075


EXC Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)