Differences between revisions 54 and 64 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 54 as of 2024-03-22 14:05:13
Size: 4001
Comment:
Revision 64 as of 2024-03-22 14:38:44
Size: 4334
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> --(A.I. upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth pico.)--
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909 -> --(A.I. upload picth, yaw pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth, yaw pico.)--
   * Gaps between magnets and coils -> MCo uppper is the minimum, but this is the best effort.
    * MCi/o: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28907 -> --(A.I. upload picth pico pictues (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for picth pico.)-- -> https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28941
    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28909 -> --(A.I. upload pitch, yaw pico pictures (R.Takahashi), or taking picture for pitch, yaw pico.)-- -> https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28941
   * Gaps between magnets and coils -> MCo upper is the minimum, but this is the best effort.
Line 14: Line 14:
   * Coil resistances and inductances -> inductances shoulg refer the past data if coil did not change, or it will be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668 -> MCo H4 looks high, it could be disconnection. It should be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning).
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696 -> One of the MCi resistance is low, but low may has no problem. If it is high, it may have some disconnection.
   * Coil resistances and inductances -> A.I. Inductances should refer the past data if the coil did not change, or it will be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning)
    * MCo: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28668 -> A.I. MCo H4 looks high, it could be disconnection. It should be measured again (Wasimi, 3/24(Monday morning).
    *MCi/e: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28696 -> One of the MCi resistances is low, but low may have no problem. If it is high, it may have some disconnection.
Line 26: Line 26:
   * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940 -> Peak of pitch shifted to higher frequency from result of Feb.2. Needs remote centering for the Oplev first (Ushiba).    * MCe: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28940 -> A.I. Peak of pitch shifted to higher frequency from result of Feb.2. Needs remote centering for the Oplev first (Ushiba).
Line 39: Line 39:
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28937
Line 52: Line 53:
   * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931    * In basic, No. Relocation was done. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28931 -> Inside of beam duct between PSL and iMC looks shining.
Line 56: Line 57:
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom?
  * Leak point was fastened tightly?
   * No dust inside, especially on the bottom? -> A.I. before closing.
  * Leak point was fastened tightly? -> A.I. when closing.
Line 59: Line 60:
  * MCE trans flange rotation (the past activity is in https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28326)   * MCE trans flange rotation (the past activity is in https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28326) -> it will be done on Mon.
Line 62: Line 63:
  * FFU stop for the MCE/MCREFL optical table and reconstruction of the window shield (MCE, MCF?).   * FFU stop for the MCE/MCREFL optical table and reconstruction of the window shield (MCE, MCF?). -> measurement of length of legs.


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


??? Recovery(202404??)



??? Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)