Differences between revisions 66 and 77 (spanning 11 versions)
Revision 66 as of 2024-03-22 14:55:11
Size: 4914
Comment:
Revision 77 as of 2024-04-05 11:21:23
Size: 6621
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 70: Line 70:
------- ----
Line 72: Line 72:
------- ----
Line 82: Line 82:
??? Recovery(202404??) X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)
------
 * [[ https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=15709 | Dan's presentation files ]]
  * Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
  * 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April. --> [[ https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29065 | klog#29065 ]]
  * Pcal-X noise in the Cal line is OK? --> [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29075 | klog#29075 ]]

------
EXC Recovery(202404??)
------
 * Suspension health check (Takahashi, Ushiba)
  * A01: Cable check
  * A02 Porality Check Type-A/C-Payload: OK Eddy Current Damping もOK
  * A03 Rubbing Check
   *A
   *C
  * A04: Range and Calibration
   *A
   *C
  * A05: Watchdog Setting: Skip
  * A06: Height Measurement
   * Done: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28780
  * A08: Calibration
   *A
   *C
  * A09: Spectrum
   *A
   *C
  * A10: Transfer Function
   * Some GASs are strange? : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29100
 * Oplev Check (Yokozawa, Akutsu)
  *
 * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD
 * X-Pcal nome works
  * Loss of power of ~ 5%: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29081
  * Cleaning: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29091
 *Windows Cleaning
  * Done: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28976,
  * Blanck ports:
 * Tcam (Yokozawa and ChenDan, and Yamamoto)
 * TMSX optical system (Akutsu and his selected persons)
 * Baffle PDs (Yokozawa and his selected persons)
 * NAB, WAB (Akutsu)
 * Vacuum system (Kimura-san / Uchiyama-kun and their selected persons)
 * Cryo-system (Kimura-san and his selected persons)


------
*** Recovery(202404??)
Line 87: Line 135:

Line 88: Line 138:
??? Recovery(202404??) *** Recovery(202404??)


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


Summary


  • TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
  • All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
    • The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
    • Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
    • Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
    • Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.


X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)


  • Dan's presentation files

    • Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
    • 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April. --> klog#29065

    • Pcal-X noise in the Cal line is OK? --> klog#29075


EXC Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)