Differences between revisions 76 and 77
Revision 76 as of 2024-04-05 10:24:00
Size: 6251
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Revision 77 as of 2024-04-05 11:21:23
Size: 6621
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 103: Line 103:
   * Done: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28780
Line 110: Line 111:
   *A
   *C
   * Some GASs are strange? : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29100
Line 115: Line 115:
 * X-Pcal nome works
  * Loss of power of ~ 5%: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29081
  * Cleaning: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29091
 *Windows Cleaning
  * Done: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28976,
  * Blanck ports:


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


Summary


  • TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
  • All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
    • The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
    • Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
    • Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
    • Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.


X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)


  • Dan's presentation files

    • Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
    • 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April. --> klog#29065

    • Pcal-X noise in the Cal line is OK? --> klog#29075


EXC Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)