Differences between revisions 78 and 83 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 78 as of 2024-04-05 11:31:21
Size: 7002
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Revision 83 as of 2024-04-05 14:05:47
Size: 7132
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 90: Line 90:
EXC Recovery(202404??) EXC Recovery(20240404)
Line 107: Line 107:
  * A09: Spectrum
   *A
   *C
  * A09: Spectrum(spectra of IM/MN photosensors.)
   * OK https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29102
Line 111: Line 110:
   * Some GASs are strange? : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29100    * OK as modeling: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29100, https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29106
Line 140: Line 139:
  * Replaced flange


IMC recovery(20240322)



one of templates for IMC closing by Akutsu-kun in 2021.


Summary


  • TF of MCe had a shift of peak frequency on pitch. Ushiba-kun will measure it again with the well-centered oplev. It will be reported at the recovery meeting or later.
  • All others should be OK for closing IMC chambers.
    • The resistance of the Coil of MCo H4 looked high. Washimi-kun will measure it again on Monday, but it won't stop closing anyway.
    • Washimi-kun will measure inductances again on Monday.
    • Check no dust inside, especially on the bottom before closing.
    • Check the leak points are fastened tightly when closing.


X-Pcal Recovery(20240402)


  • Dan's presentation files

    • Path2 drift is concerns. However, we expect we can compensate for the drift by using pico-mirrors.
    • 5% power loss is concerned. It should be checked on 3~4 April. --> klog#29065

    • Pcal-X noise in the Cal line is OK? --> klog#29075


EXC Recovery(20240404)



*** Recovery(202404??)



*** Recovery(202404??)


KAGRA/IFOIntegration2024/Recovery20240322 (last edited 2024-04-05 16:16:04 by miyoki)