Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2019-03-11 16:26:32
Size: 4440
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2019-03-12 22:34:48
Size: 4440
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 44: Line 44:
   * Now talk is assigned at Instrument science plenary: [[https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/DisplayMeeting?conferenceid=1022|Link to DCC (not accessible with KAGRA)]]    * Now talk is assigned at Instrument science plenary: [[https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/DisplayMeeting?conferenceid=1022|Link to DCC (now accessible with KAGRA)]]

FPC Meeting on 2019/03/08 13:00 - (JST)

Participants: Chunglee Kim, Kentaro Komori, Matteo Leonardi, Yuta Michimura, Atsushi Nishizawa, Kentaro Somiya, SH

Zoom meeting(2): https://zoom.us/j/6676627462

Action Items

  • Collecting the science part (Coordinated by Nishizawa, ... )
  • More detailed scoring of science cases (currently only factor of 2 or not)
  • Scoring the relevance to KAGRA and feasibility of each technology: current version by KS, YM, SH: done, circulation to ML, KK

  • Sensitivity optimization
  • Fill-up the remaining part in Technology Survey coordinated by
    • Matteo : squeezing and filter cavity
    • Michimura : Low frequency related
    • Haino : Cryogenic and mirrors based on inputs
  • KAGRA sensitivity code management
  • Talks

Minutes

  • Review of science section (Nishizawa)Slides

    • We are waiting for 9 topics for CBC and 3 for others

    • (Somiya) What is the frequencies of higher order ((3,3), (4,4)) bringdown modes ? => similar to the fundamental mode (2,2)

    • (Haino) The sensitivities in P.11 (Stellar oscillation) look strange => to be checked with the author

    • (Haino) Why KLF >> bK for BNS ? => Narrow band (like LF) can break the degeneracy for BNS

    • (Haino) More detailed scoring would help to evaluate which upgrade plans have more science cases => action item

  • Some new idea and discussion of sensitivity optimization (Haino) Slides

    • (Matteo) Why don't we try to combine 40kg and high power instead of FD squeezing ? => It can be also done, but the feasibility of 40kg mirror is still uncertain. So SH thought that FD squeezing is a bit more feasible at this stage.

    • (Matteo) Increasing the filter cavity length from 100m to 300m is just the scaling of cost, which we need a kind of technological jump from 30m to 100m. The longer filter cavity is more important for heavy mass upgrade option.
    • (Somiya) Buonanno & Chen code (BnC) can also take account of finite SRC length by modifying the beta term

    • (Somiya) Why higher finesse is not preferred ? => The arm round trip loss (rtl) is more limiting the sensitivity with higher finesse

    • (Somiya) We should score each technology both in relevance to KAGRA and feasibility => action item

  • KIW5 (Feb./16) report (Michimura, Haino)

  • FPC talk in LVC meeting (Mar./18-21) (Haino)

  • Satellite meeting at f2f, Apr./18

    • We may ask to some FPC sub-groups (now a kind of sub-people) to give talks. We will also ask for contributed talks.
  • GWADW, May/19-25

    • A few from FPC will go there, we may ask for a few talks related with FPC ?
  • etc.
    • Some complains on the current format of references in the white paper. => At this stage we accept any kinds of reference formats and later on we will convert into one specific format.

KAGRA/KSC/FPC/Meetings/190308 (last edited 2019-03-12 22:36:42 by SadakazuHaino)