Differences between revisions 1 and 7 (spanning 6 versions)

iKAGRA Oplev Calibration

Here's summary of calibration of optical levers. K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_(PIT|YAW)_GAIN are the calibration factors which convert counts (normalized with quadrant sum) to urad. For IMC mirrors, FM1 "cal" in K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_(PIT|YAW) filter bank is also used for calibration

March Test Run (Mar 25 9:00 - Mar 31 17:00)

$(OPTIC)	K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN	K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_YAW_GAIN	Quadrant sum	Related klog
EX				988 (after collimator change)
EY				1031 (after collimator change)
BS				949,952 (EX, EY values in the klog are wrong because we changed collimators)
PR3				932
MCI				569
MCO				569
MCE				569

Please put March values

April Test Run (Apr 11 9:00 - Apr 25 17:00)

$(OPTIC)	K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN	K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_YAW_GAIN	Quadrant sum	Related klog
EX	128.6	-131.1	1497	1436 (after folding)
EY	109.5	-103.2	10066	1374 (after folding)
BS	168.0	-195.0	12110	949,952 (EX, EY values in the klog are wrong because we changed collimators and configuration to folded)
PR3	244.9	229.4	37882	932 (quadrant sum seems low compared with the value in the klog)
MCI	1.0 (FM1 58.1395)	1.0 (FM1 56.1798)	85345	569 (strange; calibration not reflected?)
MCO	12.5	12.5	13144	569 (strange; calibration not reflected?)
MCE	1.0 (FM1 29.5858)	1.0 (FM1 25.641)	21806	569 (strange; calibration not reflected?)

April values are noted by T. Akutsu on Apr 19, 2016

KAGRA/Observation/iKAGRA/OplevCalibration (last edited 2016-04-20 16:47:01 by YutaMichimura)

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2016-04-20 10:18:28 → 
  Size: 2058
  Editor: YutaMichimura
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 7 as of 2016-04-20 15:43:20 → ⇥
  Size: 2430
  Editor: YutaMichimura
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 3:
-Here's summary of calibration of optical levers
+Here's summary of calibration of optical levers. K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_(PIT|YAW)_GAIN are the calibration factors which convert counts (normalized with quadrant sum) to urad.
For IMC mirrors, FM1 "cal" in K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_(PIT|YAW) filter bank is also used for calibration
-Line 6:
+Line 7:
-||$(OPTIC) ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN || Sum || Related klog ||
+||$(OPTIC) ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_YAW_GAIN || Quadrant sum || Related klog ||
-Line 12:
+Line 13:
-||MCI || || || ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]]||
 Line 14:
+||MCE || || || ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]]||
-Line 18:
+Line 19:
-||$(OPTIC) ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN || Sum || Related klog ||
+||$(OPTIC) ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN ||K1:VIS-$(OPTIC)_TM_OPLEV_YAW_GAIN || Quadrant sum || Related klog ||
-Line 22:
+Line 23:
-||PR3 ||244.9 || 229.4 ||37882 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=932|932]] ||
||MCI ||  1.0 ||   1.0 ||85345 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]](strange; calibration not reflected?) ||
||MCI || 12.5 ||  12.5 ||13144 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]](strange; calibration not reflected?) ||
||MCO ||  1.0 ||   1.0 ||21806 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]](strange; calibration not reflected?) ||
+||PR3 ||244.9 || 229.4 ||37882 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=932|932]] (quadrant sum seems low compared with the value in the klog)||
||MCI ||  1.0 (FM1 58.1395) ||   1.0 (FM1 56.1798) ||85345 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]] (strange; calibration not reflected?) ||
||MCO || 12.5 ||  12.5 ||13144 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]] (strange; calibration not reflected?) ||
||MCE ||  1.0 (FM1 29.5858)||   1.0 (FM1 25.641) ||21806 ||[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=569|569]] (strange; calibration not reflected?) ||