Differences between revisions 11 and 15 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 11 as of 2024-04-12 15:31:20
Size: 2059
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2024-04-12 15:51:22
Size: 2406
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:
     * moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept
     * 2nd graph shows some bumps or moving peaks exist.
     *
3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept
     * Moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept
     * 2nd and 3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept, we should check it after the pump down.
Line 28: Line 27:
    * F0 is close to the edge, so the gain is high. -> accept
    * F1 is within the range enough, we have no explanation for why the gain is so high. The reason for the dip of 8Hz depends on coupling, the earthquake might change the coupling. 1.6Hz peak showed in the new data, but we do not know why. However, no control is applied, so -> accept
Line 29: Line 30:
    


IYC Recovery(20240407)


KAGRA/Recovery2024/IYC (last edited 2024-04-15 12:31:12 by TakashiUchiyama)