|
Size: 2477
Comment:
|
← Revision 23 as of 2024-04-15 12:31:12 ⇥
Size: 3868
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| * A01: Cable check | * A01: Cable check -> accept |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
| * A02 Porality Check | * A02 Porality Check -> accept |
| Line 12: | Line 12: |
| * According to Ushiba-kun's picture, they show that all the poraries are correct -> accept | |
| Line 17: | Line 18: |
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- * A06: Height Measurement -> accept * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29064 * A08: Calibration:skip * A09: Spectrum(spectra of IM/MN photosensors.) -> accept * ITMY IM/MN photosensors: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29140 * ITMY tower sensor: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29141 * Moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept * 2nd and 3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept, we should check it after the pump down. * A10: Transfer Function -> accept * Transsfer function : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138 * F0 is close to the edge, so the gain is high. -> accept * F1 is within the range enough, we have no explanation for why the gain is so high. The reason for the dip of 8Hz depends on coupling, the earthquake might change the coupling. 1.6Hz peak showed in the new data, but we do not know why. However, no control is applied, so -> accept * EQ stop: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29087 -> accept * Oplev Check (Yokozawa, Akutsu) -> accept * path check: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29098 * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29135 * Flash was seen -> accept *Windows Cleaning -> accept * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29128 ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- |
|
| Line 23: | Line 49: |
| * Moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept * 2nd and 3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept, we should check it after the pump down. |
|
| Line 27: | Line 51: |
| * F0 is close to the edge, so the gain is high. -> accept * F1 is within the range enough, we have no explanation for why the gain is so high. The reason for the dip of 8Hz depends on coupling, the earthquake might change the coupling. 1.6Hz peak showed in the new data, but we do not know why. However, no control is applied, so -> accept |
|
| Line 30: | Line 52: |
| Line 33: | Line 54: |
| * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29135 * Flash was seen -> accept |
* Green flash at REFL and Trans PD * |
| Line 38: | Line 59: |
---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ---- |
|
| Line 46: | Line 69: |
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- * NAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28998 -> accept * WAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28984 -> accept ------- * There were some discussions written in each item, but all items were accepted. ------- ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- |
|
| Line 48: | Line 81: |
---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ---- |
IYC Recovery(20240407)
- Suspension health check (Takahashi, Ushiba)
A01: Cable check -> accept
- Re-cabling of BF damper
A02 Porality Check -> accept
- Magnet gluing
According to Ushiba-kun's picture, they show that all the poraries are correct -> accept
- A03 Rubbing Check
- judge by the transfer functions
- A04: Range and Calibration
- A05: Watchdog Setting: Skip
![/!\](/moin_static193/modern/img/alert.png "/!\"){kind=small}
Edit conflict - other version:
A06: Height Measurement -> accept
A08: Calibration:skip
A09: Spectrum(spectra of IM/MN photosensors.) -> accept
ITMY IM/MN photosensors: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29140
ITMY tower sensor: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29141
Moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept
2nd and 3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept, we should check it after the pump down.
A10: Transfer Function -> accept
Transsfer function : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138
F0 is close to the edge, so the gain is high. -> accept
F1 is within the range enough, we have no explanation for why the gain is so high. The reason for the dip of 8Hz depends on coupling, the earthquake might change the coupling. 1.6Hz peak showed in the new data, but we do not know why. However, no control is applied, so -> accept
EQ stop: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29087 -> accept
Oplev Check (Yokozawa, Akutsu) -> accept
path check: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29098
Green flash at REFL and Trans PD : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29135
Flash was seen -> accept
Windows Cleaning -> accept
Edit conflict - your version:
- A06: Height Measurement
A08: Calibration:skip
- A09: Spectrum(spectra of IM/MN photosensors.)
ITMY IM/MN photosensors: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29140
ITMY tower sensor: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29141
- A10: Transfer Function
Transsfer function : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138
- Oplev Check (Yokozawa, Akutsu)
path check: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29098
- Green flash at REFL and Trans PD
- Windows Cleaning
End of edit conflict
Tcam (Yokozawa and ChenDan, and Yamamoto)
- Baffle PDs (Yokozawa and his selected persons):
- NAB, WAB (Akutsu)
Edit conflict - other version:
NAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28998 -> accept
WAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28984 -> accept
- There were some discussions written in each item, but all items were accepted.
Edit conflict - your version:
End of edit conflict
- Vacuum system (Kimura-san / Uchiyama-kun and their selected persons)
- Nasty air parts were replaced.
- Vacuum alert recovery after pumping down.
- GV interlock will be tried after pumping down.
- N2 purge is necessary for IYV.
- Cryo-system (Kimura-san and his selected persons)
- All temp signals are obtained?
- Cryocon alert to slack after cooling.
- No interlock for TMP around the Cryostat.