Differences between revisions 7 and 17 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2024-04-12 10:28:28
Size: 1544
Comment:
Revision 17 as of 2024-04-12 15:54:51
Size: 2477
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:
     * Moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept
     * 2nd and 3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept, we should check it after the pump down.
Line 24: Line 26:
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138    * Transsfer function : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138
    * F0 is close to the edge, so the gain is high. -> accept
    * F1 is within the range enough, we have no explanation for why the gain is so high. The reason for the dip of 8Hz depends on coupling, the earthquake might change the coupling. 1.6Hz peak showed in the new data, but we do not know why. However, no control is applied, so -> accept
   * EQ stop: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29087
    
Line 26: Line 32:
  *
  *
 * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD
  *
   * path check: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29098
 * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29135
  * Flash was seen -> accept
Line 32: Line 37:
  *    * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29128
Line 41: Line 46:
  *    * NAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28998
   * WAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28984


IYC Recovery(20240407)


KAGRA/Recovery2024/IYC (last edited 2024-04-15 12:31:12 by TakashiUchiyama)