Differences between revisions 7 and 19 (spanning 12 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2024-04-12 10:28:28
Size: 1544
Comment:
Revision 19 as of 2024-04-12 16:00:05
Size: 2602
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
  * A01: Cable check   * A01: Cable check -> accept
Line 12: Line 12:
   * According to Ushiba-kun's picture, they show that all the poraries are correct -> accept
Line 17: Line 18:
  * A06: Height Measurement   * A06: Height Measurement -> accept
Line 20: Line 21:
  * A09: Spectrum(spectra of IM/MN photosensors.)   * A09: Spectrum(spectra of IM/MN photosensors.) -> accept
Line 23: Line 24:
     * Moving peaks exist, but amplitudes are not so high and frequency is far from controls. -> accept
     * 2nd and 3rd graph shows it can be removed when evacuated. -> accept, we should check it after the pump down.
Line 24: Line 27:
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138    * Transsfer function : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29138
    * F0 is close to the edge, so the gain is high. -> accept
    * F1 is within the range enough, we have no explanation for why the gain is so high. The reason for the dip of 8Hz depends on coupling, the earthquake might change the coupling. 1.6Hz peak showed in the new data, but we do not know why. However, no control is applied, so -> accept
   * EQ stop: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29087
    
Line 26: Line 33:
  *
  *
 * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD
  *
   * path check: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29098
 * Green flash at REFL and Trans PD : https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29135
  * Flash was seen -> accept
Line 32: Line 38:
  *    * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=29128
Line 41: Line 47:
  *    * NAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28998
   * WAB: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=28984


IYC Recovery(20240407)


KAGRA/Recovery2024/IYC (last edited 2024-04-15 12:31:12 by TakashiUchiyama)