Size: 2583
Comment:
|
Size: 2631
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 12: | Line 12: |
Line 52: | Line 53: |
with tau=0.4 sec Gaussian (fixed for all templates), template length 4 sec with 16kHz, and the Tukey window r=0.1 in order to start- and end-edges of the template are fallen down to be exactly zero. In addition that, we applied the f^2 effect and normalized to be 1 at the maximum amplitude of the template waveform. |
with tau=0.4 sec Gaussian (fixed for all templates, and its peak is located on the center of the template), template length 4 sec with 16kHz, and the Tukey window r=0.1 in order to start- and end-edges of the template are fallen down to be exactly zero. In addition, we applied the f^2 effect and normalized to be 1 at the maximum amplitude of the template waveform. |
Memo of Hardware Injection (Sine-gaussian waveforms)
* Notation: Start timing, EXC-channel, Comment
X-PCAL: 1271614656, K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_0_INJ_V_EXC
DARM2: 1271615520, K1:LSC-DARM2_EXC
X-ARM: 1271616384, K1:VIS-ETMX_TM_SUMOUT_L_EXC
Y-ARM: 1271617248, K1:VIS-ETMY_TM_SUMOUT_L_EXC (1st injection) : Stopped just after starting because of the lockloss.
Y-ARM: 1271617856, K1:VIS-ETMY_TM_SUMOUT_L_EXC (2nd injection)
After sending 6 seconds of zeroes to signal injection stream, we sent the 4 sec template signal, 12 sec of zeros, 4 sec template, 12 sec of zeros, ... The peaks were located in the center of each templates. It means that the peaks of injected signal were located on GPS0=8+16*n (n=0,1,2,...)
Sine freq [Hz] |
Offset for the start timing of template [sec] |
Amplitude |
||
|
(Peaks are located after 2 sec of these timing) |
X-PCAL |
DARM2 |
X-ARM,Y-ARM |
4.11 |
6 |
3.5 |
6 |
15 |
5.13 |
22 |
3.5 |
6 |
15 |
7.07 |
38 |
3.5 |
6 |
15 |
8.03 |
54 |
3.5 |
6 |
15 |
16.23 |
70 |
3.5 |
15 |
25 |
17.03 |
86 |
3.5 |
15 |
25 |
23.07 |
102 |
3.5 |
6 |
10 |
27.11 |
118 |
3.5 |
6 |
6 |
29.50 |
134 |
3.5 |
3 |
6 |
30.70 |
150 |
3.5 |
3 |
6 |
36.0397 |
166 |
3.5 |
4 |
6 |
49.6310 |
182 |
3.5 |
4 |
6 |
52.8212 |
198 |
3.5 |
4 |
6 |
64.1717 |
214 |
3.5 |
4 |
6 |
88.6404 |
230 |
3.5 |
4 |
6 |
120.879 |
246 |
3.5 |
5 |
5 |
139.222 |
262 |
3.5 |
5 |
5 |
164.842 |
278 |
3.5 |
5 |
5 |
224.795 |
294 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
268.234 |
310 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
306.553 |
326 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
356.222 |
342 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
418.045 |
358 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
456.345 |
374 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
570.088 |
390 |
3.5 |
7 |
7 |
682.134 |
406 |
3.5 |
15 |
15 |
777.428 |
422 |
3.5 |
80 |
80 |
892.234 |
438 |
3.5 |
80 |
80 |
1060.18 |
454 |
3.5 |
80 |
160 |
1239.23 |
470 |
3.5 |
80 |
80 |
1445.76 |
486 |
3.5 |
80 |
80 |
1641.45 |
502 |
3.5 |
80 |
80 |
1991.58 |
518 |
3.5 |
340 |
340 |
2688.64 |
534 |
3.5 |
440 |
440 |
3666.50 |
550 |
3.5 |
440 |
440 |
4998.17 |
566 |
3.5 |
640 |
640 |
with tau=0.4 sec Gaussian (fixed for all templates, and its peak is located on the center of the template), template length 4 sec with 16kHz, and the Tukey window r=0.1 in order to start- and end-edges of the template are fallen down to be exactly zero. In addition, we applied the f^2 effect and normalized to be 1 at the maximum amplitude of the template waveform.