Differences between revisions 42 and 43
Revision 42 as of 2018-05-27 07:19:42
Size: 5053
Comment:
Revision 43 as of 2018-05-27 21:09:33
Size: 5174
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 39: Line 39:
 * Make the models for the online h(t) reconstruction
 * Provide the necessary DAQ channels for the low-latency calibration
 * Make the models for the online h(t) reconstruction [status: ''ongoing'' | expected finish: '''Mar. 15, 2019''']
 * Provide the necessary DAQ channels for the low-latency calibration[status: ''ongoing'' | expected finish: '''Mar. 15, 2019''']

Calibration Tasks and Milestones (Towards O3)

Goals

  • Make the whole chain of h(t) reconstruction running with Pcal
    • 3 types of h(t) provide (online, low latency, offline)
    • online h(t) generation using Pcal(DGS)
    • low latency and offline will be similar code
  • Accuracy at the initial LIGO O1 level (10%,10deg.)
    • LIGO also have many try and error
    • free sweging is used for calibration method comparison
    • final goal is 1%, 1deg.
  • By the starting of phase-2 engineering run (well in advance of joining O3)

Task (Responsible and sub-responsible person(s))

  • Cross out if the tasks are completed

Listing-up (S.Haino and responsible people)

  • List-up tasks and responsible person

  • List-up milestones and deadline
  • Submit the list of task and milestone to the KAGRA scheduler

Pcal (Y.Inoue, C.Kozakai, Cory, Bin-Hua)

  • Install Pcal at X and Y-end and coordinate the long-term Pcal characterization
  • Prepare for the necessary EPICS channels to the online system for the calibration

  • List-up the systematic error budget table for O3
  • Achieve 1% displacement error
  • Absolute power calibration
    • Contact person of working standard of Toyama univ.
    • Absolute calibration organization
  • Maintenance at Kamioka site.
  • BH should stay Kamioka and periodic work
  • Telephoto camera
    • Installation is almost done
    • Maintenance of TCam is done by T.Yokozawa
    • IR filter issue(spare camera), additional spare camera.
    • Image analysis by Tomigami.

Front-end (T.Yamamoto, +1person from off-site)

  • Make the models for the online h(t) reconstruction [status: ongoing | expected finish: Mar. 15, 2019]

  • Provide the necessary DAQ channels for the low-latency calibration[status: ongoing | expected finish: Mar. 15, 2019]

  • ...

Low-latency and offline (D.Tuyenbayev, S.Tsuchida, S.Haino)

  • Ask to LIGO CAL team for the detailed information of gstlal-calibration (DT) [status: ongoing | expected finish: none]

  • Make gstlal-calibration running on a machine at KAGRA (DT, SH) [status: ongoing | expected finish: Jul 15]

    • Find names and versions of all prerequisite libraries
    • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at AS
    • Test gstlal-cal pipeline on an AS machine
    • Install prerequisites and gstlal-cal package on a machine at KAGRA
    • Test the pipeline on a KAGRA machine
  • Use gstlal-calibration for the offline h(t) reconstruction of bKAGRA phase-1 data (ST, DT) [status: to do | expected finish: Aug 15]

    • Note: depends on the installation of gstlal-cal on a machine at AS
    • Produce dummy output equivalent to online cal output
    • Compare gstlal and online outputs of bKAGRA phase-1 data
  • Generate status vector (DT, ST, SH) [status: to do | expected finish: Sep 15]

    • Decide status vector bits
    • Modify (adapt) the function that generates the status vector
    • Produce the status vector data
  • Generation of FIR filters for KAGRA DARM model (ST, DT) [status: to do | expected finish: end of bKAGRA phase-2]

    • Note: Depends on the readiness of the DARM model
  • Feed KAGRA online channels into gstlal-calibration and generate low-latency h(t) (ST, DT, SH) [status: to do | expected finish: end of bKAGRA phase-2]

    • Note: Depends on the readiness of DMT
    • Run run the pipeline in low-latency during bKAGRA phase-2

DARM model (T.Yamamoto, D.Tuyenbayev, T.Yokozawa)

  • Make a subway map of the KAGRA DARM model
  • Optimize the calibration lines
  • Coordinate the Open Loop Gain (OLG) Transfer function measurements
  • Estimate and trace the slow time variation of the calibration parameters
  • Electronics transfer function.

Pcal verification (Y.Inoue,...)

  • Coordinate h(t) calibration with the Free-swinging Michelson method
  • Compare h(t)s calibrated between Free-swinging Michelson and Pcal
  • Compare h(t)s calculated between diff,common,...

Hardware injection (T.Yokozawa, Cory )

  • Make the online model for the hardware injection with actuators[status: fist version finished | expected finish: end of August]

  • Make the online model for the hardware injection with Pcal[status: fist version finished | expected finish: end of August]

  • Coordinate the hardware injection tests[status: to do | expected finish: end of bKAGRA phase-2]

  • Analyze the hardware injected data and verify the DARM subway map[status: to do | expected finish: end of bKAGRA phase-2]

Systematic errors assignment (T.Sawada, Y.Inoue, S.Haino, T.Yokozawa)

  • Estimate the systematic errors due to calibration
  • Make a simulation.
  • Provide the number (amplitude and phase) for the data analysis group
  • Provide the calibration envelopes for the data analysis group
  • (If possible) Incorporate DARM model and parameter uncertainties in the data analysis
    • A.Miyamoto will show the first results of the effect of calibration uncertainties to the POP III data analysis

KAGRA/Subgroups/CAL/WG/tasks (last edited 2018-09-06 09:54:51 by chihiro.kozakai)