Differences between revisions 1 and 11 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2016-09-20 00:16:45
Size: 257
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2017-04-06 17:51:58
Size: 1359
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
* 2016/4/19 === 2016/4/19 OMC seminar at Hongo ===
  [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5256|presentation file]]
  [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5257|supplementary file]]
Line 5: Line 7:
  OMC seminar at Hongo === 2016/6/10 OMC seminar at Tokyo Tech ===
  [[attachment:Somiya150610part2v2.pptx]]
Line 7: Line 10:
* 2016/6/10 === 2016/6/24 OFI telecon ===
  [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5313|presentation file]]
Line 9: Line 13:
  OMC seminar at Tokyo Tech === 2016/8/26 F2F meeting ===
  [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5564|presentation file]]
Line 11: Line 16:
* 2016/6/24 === 2016/9/5 Telecon with Yamamoto-san ===
Line 13: Line 18:
  OFI telecon   * It is reasonable that the output field is more sensitive to the OMC tilt with the BS map added.
  * We will not need an FFT calculation as the FINESSE simulation seems to converge.
  * Additional optics (ITM or OFI) may increase the requirement but will be a factor so we can proceed to design suspensions with the current requirement.
Line 15: Line 22:
* 2016/8/26 === 2016/9/14 Telecon with IOO members ===
Line 17: Line 24:
  F2F meeting   * A blade spring for BRT suspension will be useful for the OMC suspension which only needs a single-stage vertical isolation at around 1Hz.
  * Requirements to OMMTs and OFI should be also given to Akutsu-kun in m/rtHz.
Line 19: Line 27:
* 2016/9/5

  Telecon with Yamamoto-san

* 2016/9/14

  Telecon with IOO members
=== 2017/3/13 ISC meeting ===
  [[attachment:Somiya170313.pdf]]

Meetings

2016/4/19 OMC seminar at Hongo

2016/6/10 OMC seminar at Tokyo Tech

2016/6/24 OFI telecon

2016/8/26 F2F meeting

2016/9/5 Telecon with Yamamoto-san

  • It is reasonable that the output field is more sensitive to the OMC tilt with the BS map added.
  • We will not need an FFT calculation as the FINESSE simulation seems to converge.
  • Additional optics (ITM or OFI) may increase the requirement but will be a factor so we can proceed to design suspensions with the current requirement.

2016/9/14 Telecon with IOO members

  • A blade spring for BRT suspension will be useful for the OMC suspension which only needs a single-stage vertical isolation at around 1Hz.
  • Requirements to OMMTs and OFI should be also given to Akutsu-kun in m/rtHz.

2017/3/13 ISC meeting

KAGRA/Subgroups/IOO/OMC/meeting2016 (last edited 2017-04-06 17:51:58 by KentaroSomiya)