Differences between revisions 7 and 11 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2016-09-20 00:28:01
Size: 1284
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2017-04-06 17:51:58
Size: 1359
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
* 2016/4/19

 
OMC seminar at Hongo
=== 2016/4/19 OMC seminar at Hongo ===
Line 9: Line 7:
* 2016/6/10

 
OMC seminar at Tokyo Tech
=== 2016/6/10 OMC seminar at Tokyo Tech ===
Line 14: Line 10:
* 2016/6/24

 
OFI telecon
=== 2016/6/24 OFI telecon ===
Line 19: Line 13:
* 2016/8/26

 
F2F meeting
=== 2016/8/26 F2F meeting ===
Line 24: Line 16:
* 2016/9/5

 
Telecon with Yamamoto-san
=== 2016/9/5 Telecon with Yamamoto-san ===
Line 32: Line 22:
* 2016/9/14

 
Telecon with IOO members
=== 2016/9/14 Telecon with IOO members ===
Line 38: Line 26:

=== 2017/3/13 ISC meeting ===
  [[attachment:Somiya170313.pdf]]

Meetings

2016/4/19 OMC seminar at Hongo

2016/6/10 OMC seminar at Tokyo Tech

2016/6/24 OFI telecon

2016/8/26 F2F meeting

2016/9/5 Telecon with Yamamoto-san

  • It is reasonable that the output field is more sensitive to the OMC tilt with the BS map added.
  • We will not need an FFT calculation as the FINESSE simulation seems to converge.
  • Additional optics (ITM or OFI) may increase the requirement but will be a factor so we can proceed to design suspensions with the current requirement.

2016/9/14 Telecon with IOO members

  • A blade spring for BRT suspension will be useful for the OMC suspension which only needs a single-stage vertical isolation at around 1Hz.
  • Requirements to OMMTs and OFI should be also given to Akutsu-kun in m/rtHz.

2017/3/13 ISC meeting

KAGRA/Subgroups/IOO/OMC/meeting2016 (last edited 2017-04-06 17:51:58 by KentaroSomiya)