Differences between revisions 7 and 8
⇤ ← Revision 7 as of 2016-09-20 00:28:01 →
Size: 1284
Editor: KentaroSomiya
Comment:
← Revision 8 as of 2016-09-20 00:29:10 → ⇥
Size: 1311
Editor: KentaroSomiya
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
* 2016/4/19 === 2016/4/19 ===
Line 9: Line 9:
* 2016/6/10 === 2016/6/10 ===
Line 14: Line 14:
* 2016/6/24 === 2016/6/24 ===
Line 19: Line 19:
* 2016/8/26 === 2016/8/26 ===
Line 24: Line 24:
* 2016/9/5

 Telecon with Yamamoto-san		 === 2016/9/5 Telecon with Yamamoto-san ===

Meetings

2016/4/19

2016/6/10

2016/6/24

2016/8/26

2016/9/5 Telecon with Yamamoto-san

  • It is reasonable that the output field is more sensitive to the OMC tilt with the BS map added.
  • We will not need an FFT calculation as the FINESSE simulation seems to converge.
  • Additional optics (ITM or OFI) may increase the requirement but will be a factor so we can proceed to design suspensions with the current requirement.

* 2016/9/14

  • Telecon with IOO members
  • A blade spring for BRT suspension will be useful for the OMC suspension which only needs a single-stage vertical isolation at around 1Hz.
  • Requirements to OMMTs and OFI should be also given to Akutsu-kun in m/rtHz.

KAGRA/Subgroups/IOO/OMC/meeting2016 (last edited 2017-04-06 17:51:58 by KentaroSomiya)