Differences between revisions 6 and 32 (spanning 26 versions)
Revision 6 as of 2021-07-14 14:23:09
Size: 2402
Comment:
Revision 32 as of 2021-07-15 18:32:49
Size: 5457
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
== Basics of KAGRA interferometer ==
 * f1=16.88 MHz, f2= 45.02 MHz, f2-f1=28.13 MHz
 * [[LCGT/subgroup/ifo/MIF/OptParam|List of optical parameters]]
 * [[https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.88.043007|PRD 88, 043007 (2013)]]
Line 21: Line 26:
=== Summary of the current status === === 1-1. Summary of the current status ===
 * Sumary of Alignment Scheme of KAGRA in O3GK [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12594|JGW-T2112594]]
Line 23: Line 29:
=== Known issues and our plans (highly uncertain) === === 1-2. Known issues and our plans (highly uncertain) ===
Line 30: Line 36:
=== Known issues and our plans (less uncertain) === === 1-3. Known issues and our plans (less uncertain) ===
Line 34: Line 40:
=== Summary of the current status === === 2-1. Commissioning status ===
 * IMC
  * IMC REFL WFS to control IP1 and MCe
   * UGF ~0.1 Hz
  * IMC TRANS DC QPD to control MCo
   * UGF ~0.05 Hz
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13916
  * IMMT1T were not used because of scattering lights when PRFPMI is RF locked
  * IMC ASC loops were turned off during O3GK due to excess noise
 * WFS and QPDs for the main interferometer
  * REFL and AS are commissioned relatively well and WFS DC centering loops are closed.
  * POP beam was too dirty and WFS are taken out
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=11506
  * TRX QPDs had strange pitch and yaw coupling
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12019
 * Xarm
  * REFL RF17 to control SOFT/HARD closed
   * UGF ~50 mHz for SOFT and ~20 mHz for HARD in yaw, ~60 mHz for both HARD and SOFT in pitch
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=11543
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=11537
   * https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10996
  * Sensing matrix measurement with POP, AS, TRX not done
 * Yarm
  * TRY QPD to control SOFT closed
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12325
 * PRMI
  * REFL RF45 to control PRM and PR3 closed
   * UGF ~0.1 Hz
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12488
  * AS RF28 to control BS closed
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12445
  * PRMI ASC sensing matrix
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14019
 * DRMI
  * BS and PR3 dither loops using POP90 closed.
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15165
 * FPMI
  * REFL RF17 to control Differential ETMs, Common ETMs closed
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=11885
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=11997
  * AS RF28 Q to control BS closed
   * UGF ~30 mHz for yaw, ~80mHz for pitch
   * https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11061
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12156
 * PRFPMI
  * AS RF to control DHARD (DETM) almost closed
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14027
  * Sensing matrix measurements for PRM and PR3
   * https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12802
Line 36: Line 90:
=== Known issues and our plans (highly uncertain) === === 2-2. Simulation status ===
 * Optickle
  * FPMI, PRFPMI, SRFPMI, DRFPMI (BRSE) sensing matrix simulations with imperfections done [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10359|JGW-T1910359]]
  * PRMI, DRMI simulations not yet
 * FINESSE
  * For LSC without mirror maps, GUI for simulations with any interferometer configurations done [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12132|JGW-T2012132]]
  * Working on ASC integration
  * Also input mode cleaner (IMC) ASC simulations and analytical calculations on going independently
Line 38: Line 99:
=== Known issues and our plans (less uncertain) === === 2-3. Strategies for commissioning ===

External Review for interferometer alignment controls (August 2021)

Purpose

From February 25 to April 21, 2020, KAGRA performed its first observing run for 4 weeks with power-recycled Fabry-Perot-Michelson (PRFPMI) congifuration. The sensitivity during the April run with GEO600, dubbed O3GK, was at the binary neutron star range of 0.5-0.7 Mpc. From July 13 to October 13, we had an intense commissioning period to try locking the full resonant sideband extraction (RSE) interferometer. We had many achievements during that period, but we have never achieved the full RSE lock yet.

During the O3GK run and the RSE trial, we faced several issues related to the interferometer alignment. The sensitivity of KAGRA depended very much on the alignment, and the best sensitivity could be achieved only when the expert aligned the interferometer manually. Almost no alignment sensing and controls (ASC) loops where closed, except for a few dither alignment loops in the power recycling cavity (PRC).

The purpose of this External Review is to receive comments from LIGO/Virgo interferometer experts on our plans to improve such situations. We would like to know if the issues we are trying to solve are reasonable, and if our plans are sound. We would also like to find out what are the issues we haven't identified yet. Finally, we would like to prioritize the works in the order of importance for the full RSE lock with ASC.

Agenda

  1. Daily alignment of the interferometer
    • summary of O3-RSE trial situation and improvement plans
  2. Commissioning and simulations for alignment sensing and control
    • summary of current situation and plans, focus on global controls using wave front sensors (WFS) and QPDs
  3. Input mode cleaner alignment sensing and control report
    • report from current on-site works

Basics of KAGRA interferometer

1. Daily alignment of the interferometer

1-1. Summary of the current status

1-2. Known issues and our plans (highly uncertain)

  • Issue 1
    • Plans ...
  • Issue 2
    • Plans ...

1-3. Known issues and our plans (less uncertain)

2. Commissioning and simulations for alignment sensing and control

2-1. Commissioning status

2-2. Simulation status

  • Optickle
    • FPMI, PRFPMI, SRFPMI, DRFPMI (BRSE) sensing matrix simulations with imperfections done JGW-T1910359

    • PRMI, DRMI simulations not yet
  • FINESSE
    • For LSC without mirror maps, GUI for simulations with any interferometer configurations done JGW-T2012132

    • Working on ASC integration
    • Also input mode cleaner (IMC) ASC simulations and analytical calculations on going independently

2-3. Strategies for commissioning

3. Input mode cleaner alignment sensing and control report

KAGRA/Subgroups/MIF/ExternalReview2021 (last edited 2021-08-26 00:30:15 by haoyu.wang)