|
Size: 3007
Comment:
|
← Revision 10 as of 2019-04-23 11:43:51 ⇥
Size: 3330
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| As of April 2019 | |
| Line 7: | Line 8: |
| * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=8394 | ISC sysmte circuit diagram ]] * [[ https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=9919 | Yokogawa's master thesis on the X arm experiment ]] * [[ | Journal paper on the X arm experiment ]] = Official reviews = * Review in March 2018 [[ https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=8103 | Material by Yokogawa et al.,]] Main focus on the selection of the optical fibers * Review in August 2017 [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=7060 | Material by Kambara et al.,]] Main focus on the readiness for the implementation. |
|
| Line 11: | Line 22: |
| = Past Considerations = = Lock Acquisition = Lock acquisition scheme has to be planed carefully because it was a big problem in the first generation large-scale interferometers. |
= Past Considerations (mostly back in 2012) = |
| Line 15: | Line 24: |
| Stochastic approach (a.k.a. lucky lock) won't probably work. Other locking schemes such as the arm pre-locking has to be considered. == Auxiliary Lock System == Also known as green laser lock, this scheme will make use of auxiliary lasers to lock the arm cavities first. ---- |
Link to Relevant documents
- As of April 2019
Official reviews
Review in March 2018 Material by Yokogawa et al.,
- Main focus on the selection of the optical fibers
Review in August 2017 Material by Kambara et al.,
- Main focus on the readiness for the implementation.
Past Considerations (mostly back in 2012)
Servo simulation
Optical Table Layout
Purchase List
SVN archive
Oscillator phase noise requirement for PLL local oscillator
See here.
Overview of Green Lock Scheme
Lock procedure
Block diagram
Description of the blocks
Phase Comparison
When you combine two beams with power P, we get the beat note with amplitude of 2 alpha P Sin phi, where alpha is the contrast (0~1) and phi is the relative phase between the fields. Thus, the phase sensitivity is 2 alpha P [W/rad]. e.g. Two 1mW beams geneartes 4mWpp beat if the contrast is 1. The slope is 0.002 alpha W/rad.
For the broadband PD, InGaAs is not relevant because of the high junction capacitance. If we use Si PD (like FFD-100 phi=2.5mm), the responsivity is eta = 0.08 [A/W].
- BBPD Transimepedance and the shotnoise intercept current are assumed to be 1e3 [V/A] and 0.3 [mA], from the experience of LIGO BBPD.
Total gain is 1 [V/rad] if we assume alpha and P to be 0.5 and 12.5mW respectively.
- Shot noise
Shot noise of the modulated beam is described by <in^2> = 2 e [I0+1/2 dI Sin(phi)], according to N. Mio and K. Tsubono, Physics LettersA 164 (1992) 255-258. Does nonstationary part cancel because of the orthogonality of the RF and LO signals???
- Consider only the stationary part, in = sqrt(2 e I0). Thus in/eta/(2 alpha P) = sqrt(e / eta / alpha / P) [rad/rtHz]. This corresponds to 2.5e-8 rad/rtHz.
Frequency noise of NPRO
- 1e4/f [Hz/rtHz] according to R. Adhikari's PhD thesis.
