Differences between revisions 18 and 20 (spanning 2 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 18 as of 2020-08-12 16:12:38 →
Size: 1617
Editor: KeikoKokeyama
Comment:
← Revision 20 as of 2020-08-19 13:31:59 → ⇥
Size: 1971
Editor: haoyu.wang
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:
 * Birefringence modeling (Haoyou)
    * Carefully testing a simple PRC configuration with the S-P conversion using a fake BS. In the model using a BS to separate S and P, there is i multiplied for the BS transmission, which does not happen in the real S-P conversion process. It should be properly treated in Finesse. 		  * Birefringence modeling (Haoyou) [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11792|Notes]]
    * The couple cavity model can hardly reflect the real S-P conversion process as S and P modes have different responses to tunings of PRM.
    * Carefully testing a simple PRC configuration with the S-P conversion using a fake BS. In the model using a BS to separate S and P, there is i multiplied for the BS transmission, which does not happen in the real S-P conversion process. It should be properly treated in Finesse.
    * The phase factor i in the BS model is a problematic thing. We need to handle with it or find new modeling schemes.

Simulation meeting 2020 Aug 12, 15:00-

Participants

Minutes

Updates from Projects

  • IFO modeling

    • Note on FPMI

      • Why not to use "diff" command (and its history)
      • Updated sensing matrix with "fsig" command
      • jupyter notebook on git was updated to use python3
      • Comparison v.s. analytical calculation

    • Note on PRFPMI

      • Matrices do not match very much :(

      • Analytical calculations seems suspicious
    • Next steps
      • DRFPMI model
      • Include the higher order modes (FPMI, PRFPMI, DRFPMI)

  • Birefringence modeling (Haoyou) Notes

    • The couple cavity model can hardly reflect the real S-P conversion process as S and P modes have different responses to tunings of PRM.
    • Carefully testing a simple PRC configuration with the S-P conversion using a fake BS. In the model using a BS to separate S and P, there is i multiplied for the BS transmission, which does not happen in the real S-P conversion process. It should be properly treated in Finesse.
    • The phase factor i in the BS model is a problematic thing. We need to handle with it or find new modeling schemes.
  • OMC modeling (June Gyu)
    • Building the OMC model. Possibly some initial results will be obtained in a week or so.
  • Simulation Interface

Plan during Aug 17-27

  • Hirose-san and Koyama-san will visit Kamioka
  • Yuzu-san will be in Kamioka for instruction from 17(Mon) afternoon to 26(Wed) evening.

Next meeting

  • Aug 19, 15:00-, zoom3.

KAGRA/Subgroups/MIF/Simulation/SimMeeting20200812 (last edited 2020-08-19 13:31:59 by haoyu.wang)