|
Size: 215
Comment:
|
Size: 3079
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| Kokeyama, Hirose, Wang, Yamamoto H, Aso, Miyakawa, June Gyu, Eisenmann, Somiya, Michimura |
|
| Line 8: | Line 10: |
| * Finesse interface | * GUI * Lense sensing noise is implemented. Quantum noise is under way. |
| Line 10: | Line 14: |
| * the purpose of this project is to set up and provide FINESSE models for other specific project like the OMC scan. * The implementing of mirror maps has several procedures. Phase tunings of PRC and SRM are still under test after implementing maps. * Only mirror maps of test masses in the arms are implemented. * We don't have mirror maps for recycling mirrors. But we have maps for the BS. We couldn't find a way to implement the BS map, so in current model, the BS map is ignored. * The phase of PRM and SRM is usually set 0 or 90 degrees depending on resonance/anti-resonance and power/signal recycling for the carrier. However, the actual tuning is more complicated for recycling cavities as it also depends on the resonance and frequency of sidebands. Note that the PRC has something to do with the RF sidebands, while the SRC relates to the signal sidebands. |
|
| Line 11: | Line 21: |
| * Some simulations have been done and June Gyu-san will show this on next meeting. |
|
| Line 12: | Line 24: |
| * We have developed the model which can calculate the birefringence angle based on the coupling matrix. * The birefringence angle of ITMX used for KAGRA is calculated. It is compared with the measurement of a discarded ITM (same growth method of installed ITMs). It seems that they have similar structures. But they are different mirrors and it is hard to see the effectiveness of the comparison. We don't have TWE maps for this discarded ITM to calculate its birefringence angle. But an interferometer is being set up which can take TWE map measurements in the future. * At the moment, we have TWE maps for a spare ETM and the birefringence measurement is done. We are going to compare simulations to measurements for this mirror. * Further discussions: * Yamamoto H: Are these efforts for birefringence going to be used in O4? What's the best sensitivity with sapphire mirrors? * Aso: Yes. First of all, we need to know the limitation imposed by birefringence if we continue to use sapphire mirrors. Secondly, we need to make mirror for O5 (not O4) by summer which is an intense work. We are unlikely to make birefringence free material so soon. O5 looks far away but actually not so much. If you look at the schedule, we need to start the production of the O5 mirror. So we need to use birefringence mirrors. The best candidates right now are the two crystals produced by GTAT before, which still have birefringence but the birefringence pattern is much more smoother. What we can do is to produce new ITMs using this kind of crystal. What we want to do is 1) to make sure the imbalance of reflectivity between the two ITMs (the current two crystals have slightly different reflections which is bad), 2) |
Simulation meeting 2021 Mar 2 17:00
Zoom2: https://zoom.us/j/6676627462
Participants
Kokeyama, Hirose, Wang, Yamamoto H, Aso, Miyakawa, June Gyu, Eisenmann, Somiya, Michimura
Agenda
Updates from Projects
- GUI
- Lense sensing noise is implemented. Quantum noise is under way.
- Ifo model
- the purpose of this project is to set up and provide FINESSE models for other specific project like the OMC scan.
- The implementing of mirror maps has several procedures. Phase tunings of PRC and SRM are still under test after implementing maps.
- Only mirror maps of test masses in the arms are implemented.
- We don't have mirror maps for recycling mirrors. But we have maps for the BS. We couldn't find a way to implement the BS map, so in current model, the BS map is ignored.
- The phase of PRM and SRM is usually set 0 or 90 degrees depending on resonance/anti-resonance and power/signal recycling for the carrier. However, the actual tuning is more complicated for recycling cavities as it also depends on the resonance and frequency of sidebands. Note that the PRC has something to do with the RF sidebands, while the SRC relates to the signal sidebands.
- OMC model
- Some simulations have been done and June Gyu-san will show this on next meeting.
- Birefringence
- We have developed the model which can calculate the birefringence angle based on the coupling matrix.
- The birefringence angle of ITMX used for KAGRA is calculated. It is compared with the measurement of a discarded ITM (same growth method of installed ITMs). It seems that they have similar structures. But they are different mirrors and it is hard to see the effectiveness of the comparison. We don't have TWE maps for this discarded ITM to calculate its birefringence angle. But an interferometer is being set up which can take TWE map measurements in the future.
- At the moment, we have TWE maps for a spare ETM and the birefringence measurement is done. We are going to compare simulations to measurements for this mirror.
- Further discussions:
- Yamamoto H: Are these efforts for birefringence going to be used in O4? What's the best sensitivity with sapphire mirrors?
- Aso: Yes. First of all, we need to know the limitation imposed by birefringence if we continue to use sapphire mirrors. Secondly, we need to make mirror for O5 (not O4) by summer which is an intense work. We are unlikely to make birefringence free material so soon. O5 looks far away but actually not so much. If you look at the schedule, we need to start the production of the O5 mirror. So we need to use birefringence mirrors. The best candidates right now are the two crystals produced by GTAT before, which still have birefringence but the birefringence pattern is much more smoother. What we can do is to produce new ITMs using this kind of crystal. What we want to do is 1) to make sure the imbalance of reflectivity between the two ITMs (the current two crystals have slightly different reflections which is bad), 2)