|
Size: 1017
Comment:
|
← Revision 5 as of 2022-06-28 18:20:48 ⇥
Size: 1087
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 16: | Line 16: |
| * But when the beam position on the ITM changes, this offset will change. | * But when the beam position on the ITM changes, this offset will change. We need more accurate birefringence characterizations for KAGRA ITMs. |
Simulation meeting 2022 Jun 2 15:00
Zoom2: https://zoom.us/j/6676627462
Participants
Naoki Koyama, June Gyu Park, Yoichi Aso, Kentaro Somiya, Matteo Leonardi, Marc Eisenmann, Haoyu Wang
Agenda
Updates from Projects
- Birefringence simulation
We performed a very preliminary alignment sensing simulation for birefringence with single arm cavity slide.
- Birefringence does not affect the operating point of the PDH error signal.
- The birefringence in ITM will add distortion to the s-pol beam, introducing TEM01 (or TEM10) mode. This will generate an offset to the wavefront sensing error signal even though the cavity is well aligned.
- This offset seems constant if the beam position on the ITM doesn't change. It probably can be compensated by looking at the transmission power of the cavity.
- But when the beam position on the ITM changes, this offset will change. We need more accurate birefringence characterizations for KAGRA ITMs.