Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2022-06-28 18:10:02
Size: 483
Editor: haoyu.wang
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2022-06-28 18:18:57
Size: 1018
Editor: haoyu.wang
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
   * Birefringence does not affect the operating point of the PDH error signal.
   * The birefringence in ITM will add distortion to the s-pol beam, introducing TEM01 (or TEM10) mode. This will generate an offset to the wavefront sensing error signal even though the cavity is well aligned.
   * This offset seems constant if the beam position on the ITM doesn't change. It probably can be compensated by looking at the transmission power of the cavity.
   * But when the beam position on the ITM changes, this offset will change.

Simulation meeting 2022 Jun 2 15:00

Zoom2: https://zoom.us/j/6676627462

Participants

Naoki Koyama, June Gyu Park, Yoichi Aso, Kentaro Somiya, Matteo Leonardi, Marc Eisenmann, Haoyu Wang

Agenda

Updates from Projects

  • Birefringence simulation
    • We performed a very preliminary alignment sensing simulation for birefringence with singele arm cavity slide.

    • Birefringence does not affect the operating point of the PDH error signal.
    • The birefringence in ITM will add distortion to the s-pol beam, introducing TEM01 (or TEM10) mode. This will generate an offset to the wavefront sensing error signal even though the cavity is well aligned.
    • This offset seems constant if the beam position on the ITM doesn't change. It probably can be compensated by looking at the transmission power of the cavity.
    • But when the beam position on the ITM changes, this offset will change.

KAGRA/Subgroups/MIF/Simulation/SimMeeting20220602 (last edited 2022-06-28 18:20:48 by haoyu.wang)