Differences between revisions 5 and 9 (spanning 4 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 5 as of 2020-03-12 03:09:39 →
Size: 479
Editor: TakaakiYokozawa
Comment:
← Revision 9 as of 2020-03-12 03:25:02 → ⇥
Size: 865
Editor: TakaakiYokozawa
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:

 * Results : [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13415|13415]]
  * There seems to be several peaks
   * 250Hz, 265Hz, 274Hz, 276Hz, 279Hz, 282Hz, 296Hz
   * 320Hz(floor), 332Hz, 350-370Hz, 394Hz
   * ~520Hz

[[attachment:13407_20200309024834_202003096.png|{{attachment:13407_20200309024834_202003096.png|Noise projection of acoustic injection to REFL table|width="600"}}]]

Summary of results for the acoustic injection

  • Yokozawa injected the better interferometer condition
  • Washimi-san evaluated the noise projection

Acoustic injection to REFL table

  • Date : 7th Mar. 2020

  • klog13382

  • After changing the sampling rate of the portable PEMs
  • IMC output power 3.4W
  • REFL PDA1DC ~7mW
  • injection time : 1267565800-1267565900
  • silent run : 1267565900-1267566200

  • Results : 13415

    • There seems to be several peaks
      • 250Hz, 265Hz, 274Hz, 276Hz, 279Hz, 282Hz, 296Hz
      • 320Hz(floor), 332Hz, 350-370Hz, 394Hz
      • ~520Hz

Noise projection of acoustic injection to REFL table

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020/Acoustic_result (last edited 2020-03-12 03:47:19 by TakaakiYokozawa)