Differences between revisions 13 and 35 (spanning 22 versions)
Revision 13 as of 2020-03-09 04:22:28
Size: 703
Comment:
Revision 35 as of 2020-03-12 03:03:01
Size: 6458
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
== '''Hammering test''' ==  * Result of the acoustic injection [[KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020/Acoustic_result| here]]

== Priority of task ==

 * Hammering test around REFL table
  * Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
  * Noise projection from chamber legs to DARM by vibrator
  * Move the accelerometers as you like

 * Hammering test around POP table
  * Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
  * Prefer the PR2-BS duct hammering

 * Hammering test of the cryochamber
  * If Tomaru-san or Ushiba-san help

 * Set the accelerometer and vibrator to OMC chamber
  * With Miyoki-san

== - Hammering test ==
Line 6: Line 25:
Line 9: Line 29:
  * Reported later, the main reason the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum   * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
Line 12: Line 33:
  *   * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
Line 14: Line 36:
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]]
  * Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
  * There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
  * Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
  * Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.

 * Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]]
  * The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
  * In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
  * After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.
Line 16: Line 50:

 * Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz

 * Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz

 * Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much

 * Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much

 * Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz

 * Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz

 * Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
Line 20: Line 82:
 * Hammering test around BS chamber
  * Possible noise source 70-100Hz
  * Identification the noise path
   * From leg? From oplev? From duct?
  * Set accelerometer for feed-forward

 * Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
  * We don't have any information from those chambers yet.

 * Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
  * This chamber is including the ISS system
  * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
  * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
  * Identification of the noise path

 * Hammering test of the MCF chamber
  * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
  * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
  * Identification of the noise path

 * Hammering test of the cryochamber
  * [[http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Minute|Discussion]]

 * Hammering test of the ducts
  * To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
  * We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test

 * Hammering test of the optical tables
  * (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table
  * (Should) POS table, TMSX table, TMSY table
  * (If possible) OpLev tables, PCal tables

 * Hammering test of the MCF-PSL tube
Line 22: Line 118:
== ・PEM injection ==  * Hammering test of the IXA and IYA chamber
  * Non black coating materials

 * Hammering test of the end station
  * EXC, EYC, EXA, EYA chambers
  * TMSX, TMSY chamber

== - PEM injection ==

=== Task list (Done) ===
 * Vibration injection to OMC legs
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13152|klog13152]]
  * We confirmed that the vibration of the OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve

 * Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
  * We couldn't find the any excess

 * Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13231|klog13231]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13338|klog13338]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13382|klog13382]]
  * From [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13382|klog13382]], we can see the some excesses 100-600Hz
  * Washimi-san and TTanaka-san are analyzing data now.

=== Task list (todo ; must items) ===

 * Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
  * After hammering test, we will investigate the environmental vibration may appear to the sensitivity or not

 * Acoustic injection to the POP table



=== Task list (todo ; if possible) ===

 * Acoustic injection to the cryochamber

 * Magnetic injection


== - Other task by PEM(?) ==

=== Task list (done) ===

=== Task list (todo) ===

 * Check and remove the unused cables

 * Clean up on the optical table

 * Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument

 * Turn off the some lights

 * Clean up the experimental area
  * Clean environment may make the clean experiment

Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)

  • Result of the acoustic injection here

Priority of task

  • Hammering test around REFL table
    • Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
    • Noise projection from chamber legs to DARM by vibrator
    • Move the accelerometers as you like
  • Hammering test around POP table
    • Understanding the noises which detected by the acoustic injection
    • Prefer the PR2-BS duct hammering
  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
    • If Tomaru-san or Ushiba-san help
  • Set the accelerometer and vibrator to OMC chamber
    • With Miyoki-san

- Hammering test

Task list (Done)

  • Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
    • There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
    • Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
    • Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
  • Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
    • In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
    • After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.

Task list (Partially done)

  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Hammering test around BS chamber
    • Possible noise source 70-100Hz
    • Identification the noise path
      • From leg? From oplev? From duct?
    • Set accelerometer for feed-forward
  • Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
    • We don't have any information from those chambers yet.
  • Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
    • This chamber is including the ISS system
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the MCF chamber
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
  • Hammering test of the ducts
    • To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
    • We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test
  • Hammering test of the optical tables
    • (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table
    • (Should) POS table, TMSX table, TMSY table
    • (If possible) OpLev tables, PCal tables

  • Hammering test of the MCF-PSL tube

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Hammering test of the IXA and IYA chamber
    • Non black coating materials
  • Hammering test of the end station
    • EXC, EYC, EXA, EYA chambers
    • TMSX, TMSY chamber

- PEM injection

Task list (Done)

  • Vibration injection to OMC legs
    • klog13152

    • We confirmed that the vibration of the OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve
  • Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
    • We couldn't find the any excess
  • Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
    • After hammering test, we will investigate the environmental vibration may appear to the sensitivity or not
  • Acoustic injection to the POP table

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Acoustic injection to the cryochamber
  • Magnetic injection

- Other task by PEM(?)

Task list (done)

Task list (todo)

  • Check and remove the unused cables
  • Clean up on the optical table
  • Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument
  • Turn off the some lights
  • Clean up the experimental area
    • Clean environment may make the clean experiment

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020 (last edited 2020-03-21 04:36:19 by TakaakiYokozawa)